This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in
Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
No, Thaddeus is in Eusebius' account, while Addai is in the Syriac. Other accounts have Thomas as the protagonist. There is a better way of handling this. —
Gareth Hughes20:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Thaddeus and Addai are the same cognate word in different languages for the same person "of Edessa" (so too is Addeus). You cannot just delete merge tags - you can disagree with a proposed merger, but removing the tags shows bad faith. 15:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
The names are not cognates: there's absolutely no evidence for that. Merging the articles would be a bad idea, because you would be merging features from different manuscript traditions. Both articles need to be rewritten to include better scholarship. Both articles and
Doctrine of Addai are in a terrible state. Now, I could see a state where mention of the Thaddeus character could be made in a section of the Addai article, including the expanded history in later Greek literature. However, merging the articles as they are would create the impression that the two characters are the same. This would be a whitewash of the manuscript tradition. —
Gareth Hughes15:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)reply
But the two characters are the same. Claimed to be one of the 70/72, sent by Thomas to Abgar in Edessa.
[1] says Addai is simply the Syriac for the [Latinised Greek] Thaddeus. The fact that the Syriac "Doctrine" and Eusebius use different stories for the reply of Jesus to Abgar is enough to justify recording both, but in the same article; one or other may be correct, or both may be wrong, but they are talking about the same person and so should be in one article. 18:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Well, the 1907 Catholic Encyclopedia is wrong. There is no evidence that the two names are the same. The Syriac Doctrina Addaei has Addai as its protagonist, while Eusebius has Thaddeus. Two sources (including Egeria) tell the same story with Thomas as the protagonist. The different manuscript traditions are quite different in their telling of the tale. Some people have perceived that Addai and Thaddeus are same name because they are both used as names of the protagonist and they have a few letters in common. However, Eusebius seems to be making connexions with Levantine traditions of Thaddeus, while Doctrina Addaei draws on Mesopotamian material (possibly from Adiabene). Any statement of complete identity between the two would be misleading. As I have said, it might be appropriate to have the articles merged, but I believe that merging the articles now would create the kind of misunderstanding that comes from a passing knowledge of the tale, like that in the Catholic Encyclopedia. —
Gareth Hughes18:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Discussions in Addai
An editor has suggested that this article may benefit from an appropriate infobox, or the current infobox could be updated. The template to use is {{
Infobox biography}}.
Merging for sure. Mar Addai article should become a redirect to
Thaddeus of Edessa with all relevant information in Mar Addai incorporated within article for
Thaddeus of Edessa. A special section could be created for the special importance of Addai to the Christians of the East.
werldwayd (
talk)
02:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
I think undue importance is being given to the healing tale and the
Doctrine of Addai within article of Thaddeus of Edessa. I think it would be preferable to give a resume of the tale and forward all the rest of the controversial material the historical veracity of which is challenged by many to the separate
Doctrine of Addai page
werldwayd (
talk)
05:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Approximate birth and death date of Thaddeus of Edessa
I think if the approximate date and place of birth and death would elevate a lot of the confusion between the Apsotle and the Disciple.
werldwayd (
talk)
05:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Thaddeus of Edessa. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.