This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Adam Air Flight 172 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Adam Air Flight 172 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 28, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that just 51 days after
Adam Air's loss of
Flight 574,
Flight 172 snapped in half after a hard landing, but there were no casualties? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
That's not 35 degrees. Looks more like 3.5 degrees.-- Robbrown 03:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
The article is good, nicely sourced, gets to the point. Discussion of the main image at its IFD stalled...until that issue is cleared up the article is on hold. Perhaps another picture of an Adam Air plane can be used? Phoenix Two 23:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
This article is being reviewed as part of the WikiProject Good Articles. We're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. This article was awarded GA-status back in 2007, so I will be assessing the article to ensure that it is still compliant. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:45, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
After an Initial read through, this article appears to at or about GA-level. I'll therefore look at it in more detail, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec ( talk) 12:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
.....to be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 12:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
.....to be continued. Pyrotec ( talk) 14:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 14:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
I'd agree with most of this. I will need to check that blog source; it depends who's blog and what it's being used to back up, although even if after checking it out I disagree it needs to go I'll get rid of it if I can anyway. As for the investigation, it is not impossible that it remains under investigation after 2 years. It featured extensively in an edition of the regular update from the investigators, but as major investigations result in an English language report I rather doubt that was more than an update - need a bahasa speaker to confirm. If not, then earlier this year it was certainly still being probed. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 20:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I'm marking this review as:- GA-status "keep". Pyrotec ( talk) 14:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
The Final Report into the accident has been released. Mjroots ( talk) 18:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
According to the page on Flight 574, Adam Air has been shut down and declared bankruptcy. The main page is written in the past tense, as a company that DID exist, but does no longer. Perhaps the article should be revised to reflect recent changes? .45Colt 14:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just attempted to maintain the sources on Adam Air Flight 172. I managed to add archive links to 3 sources, out of the total 3 I modified, whiling tagging 0 as dead.
Please take a moment to review my changes to verify that the change is accurate and correct. If it isn't, please modify it accordingly and if necessary tag that source with {{
cbignore}}
to keep Cyberbot from modifying it any further. Alternatively, you can also add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page's sources altogether. Let other users know that you have reviewed my edit by leaving a comment on this post.
Below, I have included a list of modifications I've made:
Cheers.—
cyberbot II
Talk to my owner:Online
15:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Adam Air Flight 172. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://www.thejakartapost.com/detailcity.asp?fileid=20061005.C08&irec=7When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Adam Air Flight 172. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://www.thejakartapost.com/detailcity.asp?fileid=20061005.C08&irec=7When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
A year ago, I added the flight origin and destination in the infobox section of Adam Air Flight 172. The destination entry in the infobox was fixed by me on the latest edit, but why didn't this article include the flight origin and destination entry in the infobox section in the first place? Kevinmuniz115 ( talk) 18:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Adam Air Flight 172. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)