![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is often claimed that the introduction of the Best Animated Feature award means that no other animated feature (after Beauty and the Beast) will ever be nominated for Best Picture. Is that actually a rule?—that is, is an animated feature now no longer eligible for Best Picture? AJD 16:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
This article needs a link to an official page where all of these rules are clearly stated. Does anyone know why Romeo & Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss ( [1]) was not in the running to be nominated this year? It seemed to fulfill all of the requirements - it's 76 minutes long and was released in a Los Angeles theatre in October. If it had been in the running, there would have been 16 contestants and thus 5 nominees. Esn 10:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Is this award presented to the producer of the film (like Best Picture) or is it presented to the director or is it presented to the studio? which ever it is, I think they ought to be listed in the table. Thanks, - ErinHowarth ( talk) 20:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This guy won't give up. Someone's got to block this vandal and protect this page. Crboyer ( talk) 08:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
208.101.200.47 ( talk) 11:08, 25 December 2011 (UTC)NealP
I think that's a good idea. Now it's hard to peruse the lists. 2A02:A453:C8B7:1:494B:F961:FC2E:4600 ( talk) 19:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
I see that Aardman Animation's film have both been listed twice, once under Aardman, and once more under each films respective US distributor (Dreamworks for Wallace and Gromit, Sony for Pirates.)
Surely for some consistency they should only be listed under Aardman (for example Studio Ghibli's and Pixar's films are not credited to Disney, Laika's not to their distributor, Focus Features). Happy Feet was a winner in 2007 (obviously a bad year) yet is not associated with any studio. Therefore there is an error in that the number of total winners still adds up to 12.
I propose removing the Aardman films from the Dreamworks sections, and adding Happy Feet under Animal Logic which now has a track record (though not a very oscar friendly one) of animated features with The Owls of Ga'hoole, Walking with Dinosaurs 3D and the upcoming Lego Movie. Verlaine76 ( talk) 11:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
@ DragonKing22: I agree with the above comment; it doesn't make sense to include duplicates in this table (e.g., Wallace & Gromit under DreamWorks, Ice Age under Fox). Otherwise, you would need to be consistent and put Pixar's films under Disney as well. Anterras ( talk) 23:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Verlaine76 Fuck you assholes!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonKing22 ( talk • contribs)
Unless anyone has an argument against it, I'd like to remove duplicates from the table. Anterras ( talk) 01:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Academy Awards which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 13:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Namely Shark tale and Brother bear.-- fireattack ( talk) 21:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
For example, Shrek is listed next to the year 2001. It was released in 2001 but won the academy award in 2002. I think it would make more sense to list the year of the academy awards, or to at least make it clear to the reader that the year listed is the year of the film's release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.225.50.168 ( talk) 18:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Academy Award for Best Animated Feature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Academy Award for Best Animated Feature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
27 animated films have been summated this year [1] Is it possible for expention (is there list ie a rule whitch limted it to five or can we have more potential). 82.38.157.176 ( talk) 23:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The Academy rules limit it up to five. That's the list from which the final five will be selected from. The official press release says: [ Sixteen or more films must qualify for the maximum of five nominees to be voted]. Crboyer ( talk) 00:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
References
I've checked and there seems to be no trace of any award being given before 2001. It's not even on the article for that year's ceremony. Also, the winning film for 2007, The Sputnik and Halley's Something something also doesn't exist. There is no trace of this film any where. Not even later in this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.238.102 ( talk) 20:46, 10 December 2016
It does not matter. Edits by unsigned editors are considered suspect and often reverted, regardless of an edit summary. Several vandals actually do leave misleading edit summaries, such as "correcting punctuation" when actually deleting paragraphs. Dimadick ( talk) 06:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Academy Award for Best Animated Feature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Obviously we're a week away from finding out nominations but I would like to know where Loving Vincent would be placed, as you know this is the first ever oil painted film so I have no idea if it qualifies as traditional animation or it would needed to be added to a separate category should it end up being nominated. I'd just like to be able to prepare in advance, as the chances are pretty high it will be nominated.-- Jack Cox ( talk) 00:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello I would like to make a new thing to this and that is to block edits to pointless edits to this page involving how their are there snubs to this and who is nominated is not important to this document and is just a person's option. Let me know, if you agree with this and if we need to have top Wikipedia users be the only ones to edit this page. -- HollywoodHero30 ( talk) 00:04, 23, December 2019 (UTC)
The article mentions that The Nightmare Before Christmas and Kubo and the Two Strings are the only animated films to be nominated for Best Visual Effects. The Lion King (2019) was also nominated for Best Visual Effects and it is absolutely not live-action. It was rendered in photo-realistic computer animation like The Jungle Book (2016). The difference between the two is that The Jungle Book has some actual live-action elements to it. The Lion King was even nominated for the Golden Globe Award for Best Animated Feature Film and Disney has never said that it's live-action [1], despite what some Wikipedia editors say when they delete the information from this page. Even the Wikipedia page for the film begins with the words "The Lion King is a 2019 American animated musical film [...]" (emphasis added). The Lion King is an animated film that was nominated for Best Visual Effects. — IJVin ( talk) 07:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
References
Frankenweenie is not a Disney film it was produced by Tim Burton Productions not Disney Animations and should be remove for the records of studio’s having more then one nominated in a year. 92.236.253.249 ( talk) 15:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Yeah pictures not animations studio difference company 92.236.253.249 ( talk) 12:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
It not a Disney animations studio film it a Disney picture film going by your logic that means every Pixar film is also a Disney film yet you do not mention them under that list Frankenweenie was produced by Tim Burton Productions not walt Disney animations studio . 92.236.253.249 ( talk) 18:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Given the amount of information that exists on this award, shouldn't the page be recategorized from a list to an article? PanagiotisZois ( talk) 13:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Anyone think we should add the controversy of the LEGO Movie not getting nominated beyond Best Original Song? I can’t decide if it’s relevant enough to include on this page. 2A02:8084:6180:5500:E550:283C:D75C:3787 ( talk) 20:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Year | Film | Nominees |
---|---|---|
2000 ( 73rd) | ||
Chicken Run | Peter Lord, Nick Park & Mark Burton | |
The Emperor's New Groove | Chris Williams & Mark Dindal | |
Dinosaur | Ralph Zondag & Eric Leighton | |
The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle | Des McAnuff |
Espngeek ( talk) 16:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)