This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
"All rights reserved" for 'krownprince/15654073655/...' means that we cannot use that photo.
I agree that showing Hamdok with a US flag is rather insulting - while many reports do suggest that Hamdok is begging on his knees to the IMF and US[1], that's up to readers to infer from the RS'd info in the article if they wish to, it's not a well-established fact, and even if it were, we generally don't put that sort of info in photos - see
WP:BLP - e.g. bloodthirsty dictators' (Rabaa massacre, Khashoggi assassination, ...) main Wikipedia photos don't shown them in caricatures with blood dripping from their hands.
[1] (I don't blame him for this - he's presumably doing the best he can in a difficult situation - and in any case, my opinion here is irrelevant on this point.
Boud (
talk)
20:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC))reply
The guidelines:
Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Images - "Images of living persons should not be used out of context to present a person in a false or disparaging light." - the US flag is not literally false, but it is disparaging.
Wikipedia:No_original_research#Original_images - "It is not acceptable for an editor to use photo manipulation to distort the facts or position illustrated by an image. Manipulated images should be prominently noted as such. Any manipulated image where the encyclopedic value is materially affected should be posted to Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Images of living persons must not present the subject in a false or disparaging light."Boud (
talk)
19:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC)reply
In 2020, Hamdok passed a law to prohibit female genital mutilation
Please, where in the law of Sudan can we read this law? Is there an article resp. a paragraph in Criminal Law? If yes, which number, which paragraph? What exactly is prohibited, also FGM Type I or FGM Type IV according to the WHO-category of FGM?
87.143.182.16 (
talk)
23:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The change is the result of an amendment to Sudan’s Criminal Law Article 141. The act is defined as removing or mutilating “the female genitalia by cutting, mutilating or modifying any natural part of it leading to the full or partial loss of its functions.” The punishment for committing female genital mutilation is three years imprisonment as well as fines.
https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/05/sudan-outlaws-female-genital-mutilation/87.143.182.16 (
talk)
00:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)reply