This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Aaron curently works as a coach at UCD in dublin, and has two daughters, Chloe Callaghan, born in 1995, and Amy Callaghan, born in 2002 —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.42.255.21 (
talk)
21:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Aaron Callaghan (footballer, born 1966). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified one external link on
Aaron Callaghan (footballer, born 1966). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. per
WP:TRAINWRECK. However, participants agreed that most of these would be uncontroversial moves as unnecessary disambiguations (except for a few brought up here) and I would recommend the nominator or others moved these themselves per
WP:BOLD, or start individual discussions. Thanks. (
closed by non-admin page mover)
echidnaLives -
talk -
edits02:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
– As primary topics; current titles are occupied by dab pages whose only link are to the article I propose moving. If moved, the dab pages should be deleted as
WP:G14. I don't expect this to be controversial, but I am opening an RM in case a naming convention that I am unaware of requires parenthetical disambiguation for any of these articles so that such articles can be identified and excluded.
BilledMammal (
talk) 15:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisted.P.I. Ellsworth ,
ed.put'er there15:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)reply
I support most of these moves. I note that the DAB page for
Alpha Kappa Pi should probably stay, as it had neglected to show this second use of those Greek letters, for an article that hadn't survived an earlier AfD vote. I've updated the DAB page list. That group,
Alfa Kappa Pi nevertheless exists, thus the DAB ensures the matter is not confused vis-a-vis
Alpha Kappa Pi (fraternity).
Jax MN (
talk)
16:18, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
But that would require evidence that he is known as Joseph, per "...an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources...". And I don't see evidence that he is known as Joseph, certainly not in the references in the article.
Tassedethe (
talk)
00:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose. This appears to be in the same batch as
Talk:Alakol, Azerbaijan#Requested move 6 March 2023, which is a
WP:TRAINWRECK: see there for the context (some of the dab pages had a single entry because they had been vandalised, some lacked entries that they should have had, some had more entries that didn't get caught by the nom's (automated?) process, while a few of the proposed moves involved changing the title to an obscure alternative name without any apparent justification). The current RM appears a bit less messy, but still: I've looked at a sample of 7 moves above, 4 looked alright, but 3 were clear fails (the ones involving the dabs
Maamigili and
KPSU, where I've restored the other links, and
Los Rosales, which I've expanded). –
Uanfala (
talk)
11:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Procedural oppose - what a clusterfuck. Close and re-nominate individually, if you cannot be BOLD and move articles without it.
GiantSnowman19:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Procedural oppose per GiantSnowman. Most of these are fine to just do unilaterally per
WP:BOLD, but we do not want to give these moves the aura of consensus since we're not going to sit here and review every single one of them individually to make sure it is appropriate. --
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠04:38, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
if I understood correctly, you would support a close of “Moved without consensus, any objection with a reasonable time frame should result in the move being reverted”? I agree with, and would prefer, such a close - they’re listed here for review, not to obtain consensus.
BilledMammal (
talk)
04:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)reply
It (the RMCD bot) always makes that call when new target titles are pages with any kind of content (not red links nor redirects). To fix it, just add dispositions for all those target pages, such as
Steve Cruz → deleted to make way for page move. Of course, they'll all have to be included in the Requested move/dated template as well. P.I. Ellsworth ,
ed.put'er there20:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Support everything that wasn't explicitly objected to above. Counter everyone else I don't seem the problem with making mass requested moves to establish a convention, and have done so several times before. In all cases, the objections to specific entries do not change the fact that the state after this move is preferable to the state before it, even if a third case-specific state would be even more preferable.
* Pppery *it has begun...17:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Support. Unnecessary disambiguation. But keep Joe Gomez where he is. Can’t find support for Joseph in RS. —
В²C☎08:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Support as unnecessary disambiguations, though I strongly agree with @
GiantSnowman that most of these can just be moved as
BOLD edits; really only discuss if the move is reverted. InvadingInvader (
userpage,
talk)
06:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Supporting all page moves whose disambiguation pages have just the one entry such as Aaron Callaghan, Aaron Lawrence ect.
Opposing page moves to target page names whose disambiguation have two or more entries such as
Maamigili as well as
Joe Gomez (footballer) for reasons above.
Note to closer: as I have seen situations like this before, the pages ended up not being moved (
example here), I think the same result could occur here as well, definite trainwreck based on my split view. Thanks -- — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Iggy the Swan (
talk •
contribs)
18:47, 16 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Support in principle but several require separate discussions, namely: Alfonso Carvajal, Alpha Kappa Pi, Howard Klein, KPSU, Maamigili and Los Rosales—
blindlynx22:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.