This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

South America: Argentina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Low-importance). Film: Argentine / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Argentine cinema task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

It's been great fun trying to rescue this article, because I had the chance to read so many viciously hilarious, and hilariously vicious reviews, of the possibly worse film ever made. Thank you, User:RHaworth for the Lulz. Bearian ( talk) 17:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I've changed "It is considered by Rotten Tomatoes to be one of the worst films of all time" to "The film received a rare 0% score on the review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes" - I can't see that any special "worst film of all time" badge or klaxon is triggered on the Rotten Tomatoes website by a low score, so we shouldn't describe the site as "considering" something like that. -- McGeddon ( talk) 17:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply