This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mjhsieh:
Anthracene:
I'm listed as one of the authors of AMBER, so I'm designating myself an expert. :) I've clarified and expanded the force field section and put in a brief summary of the software.
I hope no one is offended that I removed the reference to folding at home. In my opinion (working in the field) the use of the AMBER ff by the Pande group isn't really any more notable than its use by many other people. I'm willing to change my mind on this, though. Anthracene 07:05, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
A new page AMBER (file format) is needed, which should cross link to Chemical file format and use also the proper [[Category:Chemical file format]] category. JKW 16:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
The image actually used MM2 but I don't think there is a visible difference. Bensaccount 19:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't think the authors isn't necessary to be listed in wiki. Or at least, I think they should be listed on the Software section, not in the introduction. What do you think about that? Lý Minh Nhật ( talk) 03:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Does the potential energy function of Amber Focefield have improper dihedral term? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.236.198.181 ( talk) 14:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AMBER. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)