This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
ABCmouse.com Early Learning Academy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "ABCmouse.com Early Learning Academy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe with the most recent edits - any of the previously raised issues/flags should no longer remain.
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:ABCmouse.com Logo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:ABCmouse.com Logo.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:ABCmouse.com Classroom.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:ABCmouse.com Classroom.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
Hey there. I did a lot of research about a year ago and made extensive edits to this page to fix what was pointed out to be advertising/promotional concerns. I thought that all facts were sourced and cited and presented a balanced view based on the available (and credible) information on the subject. In September 2016 this tag went up on the page again. I recently reviewed the whole article again closely and it read as pretty straight forward and factual (to me), but I did edit out some things that may have been considered extraneous (and therefore promotional) and added a minor amount of new citation/research. It would be great to know if there's anything specific that the user who placed the Advert tag considers problematic. It's always best to get the article into shape rather than to let a tag like that linger. Happydadnyc ( talk) 19:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
An IP editor, with only one edit outside this article, appears to have rearranged the article, removing some references. I am not certain if it's promotional/whitewashing but it appears to be either a COI or undisclosed editing for payment. Ifnord ( talk) 19:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)