This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
In the article there is this piece of text that says "Even reviewers who dislike the comic for other reasons have applauded its design qualities" and actually that's not true because the layout is lazy and bad, seems like an oversight.
Should there not be any mentioning of the frequent breakage of the 4th wall? For instance when the cat pulled out the roll of toilet paper the paper curled itself around some of the parts separating the panels in the strip. Other times it is Edda who stretches out, gripping the same separators for support.
Secondly many of the strips are without text and many of these seem like worshipping of Edda. I wonder if the author, who shares many aspects with Amos, married someone who is thinly disguised as Edda. --12:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referncing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb ( talk) 11:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
For quite a while the servers for 9 Chickweed Lane's main online venue, comics.com, have been slow and sluggish. As of September 6, they have completely disappeared, and their name can't even be resolved by DNS. This isn't yet something that should be reflected on this page, but at some point it probably should. -- Dan Griscom ( talk) 12:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Aug 9, 2010 comic has Gran say that she had a second child after Juliette. I find no reference to Juliette's half sibling on the WP page; is this character known?
With the help of a fan community searching the archives he has been identified as Roger. There are a handful of references to him, generally Juliette speaking of "Your uncle Roger". The general impression is that the family avoids him. I've added a brief note to his father's entry. Saxophobia ( talk) 10:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
someone updated him, as November 22nd he made his first appearance? and he might be gay but hiding that even from himself, but did not add it, as it is not officially confirmed Verdad1963 ( talk) 16:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
The article spells Elliot Greene's name with one T, but the strip of 2010-10-13 http://comics.com/9_chickweed_lane/2010-10-13/ gives it with two T's. DWorley ( talk) 15:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
as she is becoming now an important character Verdad1963 ( talk) 16:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
When writing about events in a work of fiction (even an on-going work of fiction), write as though the reader is reading in "encyclopedic time" - that is, some years from now. For example, don't use the word "recent" and always use the past tense, even to describe events taking place "that day" in the work of fiction. Tobeprecise ( talk) 16:03, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
There was a story arc that played out over Jan 2015, until sometime in February, or April which went into more details in regards to Martine. It covers her and Bill's story with some detail, and ends with the revelation that Martine was not just "mortally wounded," but rather shot/murdered by a soldier who was with Bill. He in turn had been shot in the back by the same soldier, with the bullet passing through him to strike and kill her. I propose adding the information from this story arc to the article, giving more details in regards to it.
Just a minor note here, but the majority of the reference links which lead to various strips that supposedly explain the item which are being referenced (god that's a mouthful), point to incorrect strips. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.190.254.108 ( talk) 06:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
In private discussions with the author of the strip, he told me that he has been advised that the LA Times' explanation for cancellation can be considered libelous in more than one way. As a result, I deleted the comment itself and links to other instances of it. The chips will fall where they will, but I think it best for Wikipedia to keep themselves out of the fray if things become legally contentious. ccdesan ( talk) 21:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
It would be nice to find some positive reviews, instead of that review by some nattering nabob of negativism. --← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 13:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)