"9.0: Live is the first live album released by American metal band Slipknot. It was released on 1 November, 2005 by Roadrunner Records" - can you not use released twice? maybe just "first live album by American band..."?
Done
"The album was recorded during the band's world tour in support of their third studio album Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) from 2004 to 2005." - commas around the album title, delink the years
Done
Every sentence in the lead starting with "the album" isn't pretty...
Done
Rolling Stone needs italics throughout (magazine;
MOS:ITALICS).
"which was removed from Slipknot due to copyright reasons" - "due to copyright reasons" is poor wording... perhaps "due to copyright issues" (the "due" and "reasons" are somewhat redundant)
Done
Check italics for PopMatters.
Done
http://www.musicomh.com/albums/slipknot_1105.htm says it's rarely played live, not that it's never been played live ("as well as the first ever live performance of "Skin Ticket""). It also doesn't mention "Iowa" despite being the ref used for that statement.
The "first ever live performance" comes from the album itself. Before the song starts the singer says, 'This is a song we've never done live before, ever' or something to that effect. Should we just cite the album somehow? Blackngold2907:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)reply
No there's no sources or anything of bands explaining the title... it is kind of self explanatory but you can't put it in the article without sources. REZTERTALKø11:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)reply