From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1.02 editor ( talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply


Expect comments soon. 1.02 editor ( T/ C) 10:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments

Hold

I will be putting the article on hold for now. Do fix up the article, and i will go through it one more time before passing. Thanks 1.02 editor ( T/ C) 06:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC) @ 1.02 editor: Due to the Jewish holiday of Passover and the Sabbath on Saturday, I won't be editing from tonight until Saturday night at the earliest. I wanted to let you know to make sure that you know that I am still committed to addressing the aforementioned issues.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 21:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  • @ 1.02 editor: Due to Passover, I won't be able to do any editing from tonight until Thursday evening at the earliest. I am still committed to addressing your concerns with the article. Thanks for your patience and stay safe. I will do a similar rewrite to Bay Ridge Avenue to address the issues you brought up in the review. @ Epicgenius: Thanks so much for helping out!-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 23:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Kew Gardens 613, no problem. @1.02 editor: Can I ask that you defer making the decision about whether to promote all the 4th Avenue Line pages until Thursday at the earliest? I would like to nominate these all as part of a single DYK. epicgenius ( talk) 23:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply
@ 1.02 editor: All the issues mentioned have been dealt with.-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 17:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Looks good, passing. 1.02 editor ( T/ C) 02:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply