Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1.02 editor ( talk · contribs) 03:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Starting the next review. 1.02 editor ( T/ C) 03:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Lead needs mention of history
• Renovations should be included in history (I assume this station went through a 1970s renovation also)
• Not all parts of the article is sourced, certain paragraphs and sentences in station layout and the last sentence of exit is unsourced
• I dont think ref 12 is a suitable reference for the exit section. The map dosent show station designs or exit only exits.

Putting the article on hold now. 1.02 editor ( T/ C) 04:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• @ 1.02 editor: Due to Passover, I won't be able to do any editing from tonight until Thursday evening at the earliest. I am still committed to addressing your concerns with the article. Thanks for your patience and stay safe. I will do a rewrite similar to Bay Ridge Avenue to address the remaining issues. @ Epicgenius: Thanks so much for helping out!-- Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 23:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Kew Gardens 613, no problem. @1.02 editor: Can I ask that you defer making the decision about whether to promote all the 4th Avenue Line pages until Thursday at the earliest? I would like to nominate these all as part of a single DYK. epicgenius ( talk) 23:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The issues and concerns that i have raised has been addressed but however is not stated on this page. Nevertheless will pass the article. 1.02 editor ( T/ C) 04:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC) reply