From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reviewer:
WikiCopter
(talk)
00:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
1. Well-written.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and spelling and grammar are correct.
- Comments '766th Unit' doesn't sound right. Can you do a regex with a script and replace it with the apparent standard, '766th?'
WikiCopter (
radio •
sorties •
images •
shot down)
03:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- I've done this in some cases, but "766th Unit" is the standard, from a North Korean perspective. —
Ed!
(talk)
18:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
- B. Meets the
Manual of Style.
2. Well-sourced.
- A. Provides sources in the correct section per the
guide to layout.
- B. Provides in-line citations.
- Comments not a prerequisite, but citations in the lead would be appreciated.
- C. Contains no original research.
3. Broad in coverage.
- A. Addresses the main topics.
- B. Stays focused.
4. NPOV.
5. Stable.
6. Images.
- A. Properly tagged and are not copyvios.
- B. Relevant and have proper captions.
- Comments Add image (preferably the map if you have none) to the infobox.
- Nevermind.
WikiCopter (
radio •
sorties •
images •
shot down)
01:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
7. Overall
- A. Onhold.
Reviewer:
WikiCopter (
radio •
sorties •
images •
shot down)
00:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
reply