This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
awards and
prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
so when i type "51st annual grammy awards" into the search box, instead of bringing me to this article, it takes me to a search results page on which the first line of the first article is "The 51st Annual Grammy Awards...". really? could we not just have that term bring you directly here and save me a mouse click?
99.153.29.112 (
talk)
16:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)reply
yeah i've been editing on wikipedia for like 6 years and i just never got around to creating an account. honestly i don't see that changing anytime soon.
99.153.29.112 (
talk)
04:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I set up a section listing the classical winners earlier this evening with a promise to add the other nominees once I have time to chase them down, but user RobynRihannaFenty deleted it all without comment. Not seeing any reason that the classical winners are any less entitled to be listed than, say, the polka winners, I've put them back. I'd ask that if there's a problem, please fix it instead of simply engaging in unexplained deletion of the entire category.
Drhoehl (
talk)
01:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I put the material back in and added some nominees, and now somebody called Firetank2 has killed it again. Why? No one seems to be willing to do more than a quick delete. Please discuss!
Drhoehl (
talk)
18:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)reply
BOLD
Why the hell are certain entries bolded for most of the categories? I don't want to change it if this means something, but it seems like some editor has gone through to select their personal favorites or their predictions to win! The awards will not take place for months. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
70.21.58.96 (
talk)
03:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)reply
I didn't see the show, so I'm not going to add this myself as I don't know enough. However, I guess a brief section with "X Y and Z were honoured in memoriam by QQQ. The arrangers have been criticized for WWW." Unless someone has objections to adding this information, I think you should just go ahead and add it
with references yourself. -Lilac Soul(
talk •
contribs •
count)07:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It wasn't so much about the doing of it, I was wondering if there was actually a reason for this? And the formatting I'm referring to is that songs should be in quotation marks and albums should be italicised, while artists should remain unquoted, nor italicised. Enboldened text s still fine to indicate the winners, though. I think
WP:ALBUM is actually a better guide. But still, my question stands: is this in this formatting for a reason, or is it just due to not looking at the guide? --
139.130.97.94 (
talk)
06:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I too agree that all songs should be in quote marks, all albums should be in italics, and winners also in bold. I think many categories are formatted wrong because editors rushed to paste the nominees in after the announcement, and didn't bother formatting them correctly. We all can fix sections and make the whole page similar and correct. It will look a lot better then. --
Mtjaws (
talk)
05:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I think I took care of all the wrong formatting. The Classical Field might have a few problems, but I'm not sure which are songs or albums or other. --
Mtjaws (
talk)
18:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Spoken Word?
Apparently there was a "Best Spoken Word Album" category or something to that effect. Stephen Colbert (and a few others) lost to Al Gore (winner in the category). Why is this category not listed? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fatrb38 (
talk •
contribs)
04:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Satriani has sued Coldplay for plagiarizing his song for their nominated song "Viva la Vida". But nothing has been proven yet, so he doesn't belong in the list. I have removed him. --
Mtjaws (
talk)
05:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Ratings
Can someone list the ratings for this and any others Grammy awards we can find, in particular 2000+ which should be the easiest to find.--Cooly123 00:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Cooly123 (
talk •
contribs)
Rihanna/Chris Brown incident
Shouldnt the fiasco between them should be mentioned? Or the fact that both were confirmed performerm Rihanna with Disturbia/Live Your Life feat. T.I. and Chris Brown with No Air feat. Jordan Sparks? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
173.87.253.70 (
talk)
22:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)reply