This article was nominated for deletion on October 21 2007. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Buses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should be deleted, it's really boring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.72.6.65 ( talk) 03:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC) reply

It's just a redirect to another article, how boring could that other article be? - Go od sh op ed 03:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Nearly every statement is cited from a third party. at least some with material explicitly discussing the subject. I think this article meets the qualification for notability as written. are there any further specific objections to notability? as a comparison, several of the articles under Category:Philadelphia-area trackless trolleys were created in 2008 and have less detail than this article. - MJ ( talk) 23:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Unquestionably notable - to my recollection, Geary is the second-busiest surface transit corridor in North America. There is substantial discussion of the routes in reliable independent sources. I do think some consolidation is in order. Given that Geary Bus Rapid Transit has taken the form of incremental improvements rather than a single massive project, I think there's a strong case to be made for merging the articles to present a similar coherent history. I would also support that merged article being the primary history of the old A/B/C streetcar lines on Geary. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 23:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

After some more research, it appears the C Geary–California has more of a historical continuation via the 1 California. I think i can find specific mentions of such if needed. otherwise, I generally support merging up Geary BRT into this article as well as expanding on at least the former A and B lines. - MJ ( talk) 01:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Pi.1415926535: I started Draft:1 California (bus line) to represent one of the system's most heavily-ridden routes and to reflect its transit heritage. - MJ ( talk) 22:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC) reply