The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@
Hog Farm: Whoa! That was fast. I usually have to wait for months for a review. Glad to have someone who knows what they are talking about looking at it—thank you very much. BTW, I never could find a usable picture of Clarence Derrick.
TwoScars (
talk)
19:15, 12 May 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Kges1901: - I've noticed that your userpage indicates that your library has access to several of the VA CSA unit histories - does that include the one for this unit listed in the further reading?
Hog FarmTalk20:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)reply
That source could obviously be very useful, especially for the War's end section and for why Major Blessing was in the hospital. It is hard to find, and I have seen prices of $70 to $99.
TwoScars (
talk)
16:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)reply
I wouldn't consider that source necessary for this GA review, although it would be for A class or FA. Unfortunately, the university library I interlibrary loan stuff through is about to go on summer term, so I don't think I'd be able to ILL a copy until August or September at the earliest.
Hog FarmTalk00:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)reply
"Do not confuse this battalion with the 23rd Virginia Infantry Regiment that fought mostly in eastern Virginia as part of the Army of Northern Virginia." - I think this is better done with a standard hatnote
I think Droop Mountain needs a sentence or two of background. It's unclear why exactly Averell was needing to get through this specific spot to get to Lewisburg
Davis's book on New Market, p. 195, gives the battalion a size of 579 at New Market, and p. 200 lists the battalion's casualties as 3 killed and 21 wounded. pp. 125-129 of Davis mentions the battalion helping to repulse a Federal cavalry charge led by General Stahel, and per p. 138 it was part of a flank attack against the 54th Pa. I can provide full bibliographic details for Davis if you'd like to include any of this.
I'm a bit unsure about the Lynchburg coverage - there's multiple paragraphs here providing a summary of the battle but very little about what Derrick's battalion did
I'll see if I can dig up anything. They were 500 men out of 14,000, so most sources discuss Early and Breckinridge—but nothing on smaller units. The map showing Patton's position is all I could find earlier.
TwoScars (
talk)
17:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)reply
No info on Cedar Creek. They were decimated by then and being temporarily led by a captain. I will see if I can find anything, but I am not hopeful.
TwoScars (
talk)
17:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Added "Located on the Confederate right near the Valley Pike, Wharton and Brigadier General John Pegram's divisions were driven back in a Union counterattack that used artillery and cavalry." after the sentence that says they were part of Wharton's Division. Used Lewis as source.
TwoScars (
talk)
20:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Sources look good enough for GA, but 35th Star Publishing would probably need to be defended at a higher assessment level
Terry Lowry is a historian with the West Virginia Department of Culture and History. He has access to all sorts of hard–to–find letters, photos, newspaper articles, and reports. His books are full of information with citations, but not well organized. One of them does not even have an index. In many cases, he is the only author for obscure WV battles.
TwoScars (
talk)
16:55, 15 May 2023 (UTC)reply
I checked my copies of Lewis's Guns of Cedar Creek and Wert's From Winchester to Cedar Creek and didn't see anything for this unit.
I think this is probably fine for GA status (sorry about providing the wrong casualty line from Davis - I was getting the 23rd and 26th battalions mixed up). I don't think it's at A-class standard quite yet, but passing for GA. Good work.
Hog FarmTalk03:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.