This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
Perhaps it means that the country must demonstrate that it contains at least eight constituent teams playing domestic cricket inside it? - i.e., as provinces or clubs or whatever. Must those eight teams each have played five matches a year for the last two years? --
DLMcN (
talk)
18:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
DLMcN: - thanks for taking time to re-read this - always good to have a new set of eyes reading something that might make sense to us long-term editors! I had to re-read the PDF source from the ICC several times myself to make sure it made sense too. I read/understand it as teams outside the top 32 must have their own domestic competition (with matches being at least 40 overs per-side), with said tournament having at least eight teams. For example, a round-robin format inside the time limit would be enough. Does that help? LugnutsFire Walk with Me19:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Yes, thanks ... Maybe we should therefore say "eight domestic teams".
There is an actively increasing interest in the game in Spain [where I live] - helped by immigrants from India and Pakistan. There probably are more than eight clubs here. --
DLMcN (
talk)
20:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Would this tournament be part of the 2027 qualification process? It seems it should be - although the use of rankings as a main pathway to qualify technically means anyone is able to advance just by winning many games.
165.12.252.114 (
talk)
06:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Still nothing official, but with 2023 Cricket World Cup done, I would say this is part of the 2027 Cricket World Cup cycle.
Moedk (
talk)
13:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Does anyone have a source that says that Saudi, Kuwait, Tanzania, and the Bahamas have qualified? Today we seem to have re-inserted these teams, sans any citation at all, and we've replaced Bahrain with the Bahamas? Unlesss someone can provide any source at all, we need to leave this blank.
ThisIsPaulina (
talk)
19:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Yes, it seems likely that there was confusion with the names and their abbreviations - "BAH" was presumably interpreted as "Bahamas", but Bahrain is the much more likely candidate... [Is there not a way of contacting the ICC directly, for clarification of the whole picture?] --
DLMcN (
talk)
07:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)reply
I have included the reference to the Czarsports website. They professionally cover information about the associate cricket. Emerging cricket and individuals like Bertus and Peter della Penna are some other sources. Like you said "BAH" is referring to Bahamas here
Cric editor (
talk)
18:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Late to the party here, but yes I assume someone mistook Bahamas for Bahrain. BAH is the code for Bahamas, BHR for Bahrain. NB: Czarsportz is not an ideal source... he is usually correct (although sometimes makes assumptions) but it is neither a primary source or a reputable mainstream news source. Great for alerting us to things that we may not have seen, but always best to then hunt for the original sources that he got the info from if possible.
Bs1jac (
talk)
12:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Fixtures were added according to Cricclubs, but I notice that the fixtures have been removed from the source. Probably just an admin thing at Cricclubs, but if they may change.
Bs1jac (
talk)
10:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Confirmed from sources such as Emerging Cricket podcast, Royal Gazette Bermuda. Groups stage fixtures are currently correct as shown here. However it is then a Super Six, not semi-finals as originally shown via cricclubs. Waiting for Cricclubs to reload the schedule.
Bs1jac (
talk)
12:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Fixture 23 February 2024
I know the scorecards at both ICC and CricInfo atm says that Tanzania v Vanuatu is played at Selangor Turf Club and Bahrain v Malaysia is played at Bayuemas Oval, but looking at the livestreams, I'm 100 % confident, the two venues are swapped.
Moedk (
talk)
03:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)reply
In this
tweet from Vanuatu's CEO Tim Cutler, with a photo of the Tournament Handbook, the right venues is shown i.e. Tanzania v Vanuatu was played at Bayuemas Oval, and Bahrain v Malaysia was played at Selangor Turf Club.
Moedk (
talk)
18:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Moedk I have raised this with Cricinfo. Difficult for wiki to show something different to the source card, as someone will inevitably change the venues to match Cricinfo.
Bs1jac (
talk)
07:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Do we know how the Table-positions get decided when teams are equal on points? Does it depend on run-rate? - or will the head-to-head result take priority? --
DLMcN (
talk)
10:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I did a Bing-search, and it indicated that it was determined by the Head-to-head encounter ... This could certainly be significant here, because it means that Bermuda will now definitely qualify for the Super-Six. [Saudi Arabia qualify only if Bermuda beat Kuwait]. --
DLMcN (
talk)
11:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
If Vanuatu beat Malaysia, and Tanzania lose to Bahrain - then the bottom three teams will be equal on points, with the "Head-to-head" results "going round in a circle" and therefore showing no clear ranking - so it will be decided on run-rate. It would be impossible for both Vanuatu and Malaysia [through playing each other] to both increase their run-rate to jump above Tanzania. --
DLMcN (
talk)
16:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Cric Editor > Do you have a source which says run-rate takes priority over Head-to-head? If not, then surely Vanuatu go into the Super Six, not Malaysia --
DLMcN (
talk)
08:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
DLMcN and
Moedk: It is H2H first. It is in the tournament regs. If correct, that means Vanuatu go through and not Malaysia. If Bermuda lose to Kuwait it also means Bermuda go through instead of Saudi Arabia.
Bs1jac (
talk)
08:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Although worth noting that some of the people on comms are not actually 100% sure themselves now! Tournament regulations (seen them) definitely say its H2H as the first tie breaker. Cricinfo of course doesn't factor this into its tables. No one seems certain.
Bs1jac (
talk)
09:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I assume so (results against other teams who progressed). All very confusing right now, but those at the ground for Emerging Cricket and Cricbuzz confirm that it is H2H according to the regs (unless something has changed or the wording is misleading)
Bs1jac (
talk)
09:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes but that is auto generated by NRR and does not apply tournament specific tiebreakers. Commentary team, Cricbuzz, at least one captain and CEO of the teams have said tournament regs state H2H. So we will have to assume that is the case until we see fixtures for the Super Six
Bs1jac (
talk)
09:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply