This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the
Main Page in the "
In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from
reliable news sources to include recent events.
Notice date: 24 June 2024. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with
Template:ITN talk if appropriate.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to 2024 Hajj extreme heat disaster. There is a clear consensus that "heat" should be included in the title of this article, as the current title is ambiguous or misleading. Many alternatives were proposed, but the original proposal seems to have the most support. A few concerns about concision were expressed, but no alternative gained significant support. The use of "heatwave" was contested and there may be consensus against using "fatalities" or "deaths".
WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE may apply, so another, more clearly formatted move request may be opened at any time. (
non-admin closure)
Toadspike[Talk]20:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Support for 2024 Hajj heat wave "Extreme heat" and "disaster" sound too subjective. While most sources do not describe it as a "heat wave", enough do that I think it is fair to use.Arcturus95 (
talk)
22:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose, see
WP:UCRN. Extreme heat and variations thereof is used more often than heat wave, and extreme heat is a meteorological term for this type of event.
BurqueMesa (
talk)
23:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose but only for the lack of "disaster" as the article itself is more about the effects of the heatwave than the meteorological phenomenon itself. Augend (
drop a line)
04:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Support, that is what I was originally thinking to be the article title. I feel like “2024 Hajj disaster" is too ambiguous of a name. A heatwave kills btw. Look at other heatwave articles. They all list deaths. I don't see why this can't be call the "2024 Hajj heat wave".
Alexysun (
talk)
05:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Note to closer: these indented opposes and supports right here appear to be opposes and supports to "2024 Hajj heat wave", and not to the original RM suggestion of "2024 Hajj extreme heat disaster" –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
09:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I would agree that heat needs to be in the title, whether "extreme" or "wave". Forecasts are for this sort of thing to become more common and more extreme in the future, so it is questionable whether in a few decades 122 degrees will still be considered "extreme" heat. I would therefore go with a title like
2024 Hajj heat wave mass fatality incident.
BD2412T02:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose, titles should be appropriate for the current climate, not for the climate in a few decades. Also, "mass fatality incident" is not a frequently used term compared to simply "disaster."
BurqueMesa (
talk)
03:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose a move to a longer title, neutral on changing the word "disaster" depending on how the article develops - currently I would not oppose "heatwave" instead of disaster" (whether one or two words). Titles should not be longer than necessary, and given we are unlikely to have another disaster to cover at the 2024 Hajj it doesn't seem necessary to say "heat wave deaths". -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (
User/
say hi!)
21:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Support as the title "2024 Hajj disaster" is potentially misleading and does not mention the extreme heat, as per Spworld2's and Darkside380's explanations. However, the other options are verbose. I suggest
2024 Hajj heat disaster as a concise and more accurate title. --
MtPenguinMonster (
talk)
04:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I've reverted the undiscussed move as an admin action. The template at the top of the article clearly states "Please do not move this article until the discussion is closed." and I do not see a consensus to move in the above discussion yet. –
Novem Linguae (
talk)
08:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose The current name is inadequate as this was not a distinct disaster. And the heat is just a factor. The BBC explains, "One reason there are may be many deaths every year at the Hajj is that many pilgrims go towards the end of their life, after saving for a lifetime. Many Muslims also go in the hopes that if they die, it is during the Hajj - as it is considered to be a blessing to die and be buried in the holy city." So, the event will naturally be the occasion of many deaths which may not be viewed as a bad thing. A better title would be
2024 Hajj deaths or perhaps just
2024 Hajj so that all aspects of this year's event can be covered.
Andrew🐉(
talk)
09:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Changing to deaths would be insensitive. Most people do not go there to die. We shouldn't be insinuating it as a death cult. And are you opposing a move or supporting a move? —
hako9 (
talk)
19:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Support. Simply calling the event a "disaster" is ambiguous, point blank. Maybe it was the only situation that could be called a "disaster" regarding this year's Hajj, but most headlines regarding these fatalities mention heat. "2024 Hajj extreme heat disaster" presents as a tad verbose to me, but probably best describes the situation. Perhaps "2024 Hajj extreme heat fatalities" or just "2024 Hajj heat fatalities" would be best. The article is, strictly speaking, about fatalities caused by extreme heat after all.
DarkSide830 (
talk)
03:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisting comment: Additional relist to discuss the specific option of "2024 Hajj extreme heat disaster", as that option is closest to a consensus
BilledMammal (
talk)
08:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.