This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This section has appeared, but only focusses on Mitt Romney and Republican candidates. There also seems to be an overly negative slant to the section as it appears to portray the candidates, especially Romney, in a negative light. Further down the page is a section that discusses how Jenny Wilson [a Democrat] distanced herself from Romney's [a Republican] stance. I mean, of course a Democrat is going to distance themselves from a Republican. I think this section needs to be reviewed and/or removed, but as it stands it could be in violation of
WP:NPOV.
Cooltrainer Hugh (
talk)
21:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Jenny Wilson is not going to go too Viking/ghetto on Mitt. She has to attract independents. Her reference to Mitt's once support of an assault weapon ban is to inoculate herself, with regard her own present-day stand likewise in favor of such a ban, among the many independents who really like Mitt (who over all is "like a rock star" in Utah). Jenny's playing the long game: i.e., her Senate bid's necessarily a long shot...but she's building name recognition and her resume toward future races for, e.g., Salt Lake mayor or a U.S. Congressional seat. Also lightening might strike and she'd beat Mitt for U.S. Senate.
But, yes, do please help with the coverage here's tone, if you can. (By the way, such articles as these's "campaign" sub-sections generally highlight major political factors that come into play during a campaign's course and a current particularly hot-button topic is that of guns, so...). --
Hodgdon's secret garden (
talk)
11:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: