This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles
is not needed to be included anymore. I would have liked to exchange it but I couldn't find the right template. Could so plz update the article with the correct EU template? Thanks, --
Scriberius (
talk)
14:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Even though Croatia has now acceded to the EU, this article is about that accession so I think the template still fits here.
TDL (
talk)
15:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)reply
Macro ramifications in lede
I added a sentence about ramifications for Serbia and Macedonia's candidacies for EU membership. I was a bit sloppy though and was reverted. I think the macro aspect is important and so is providing links to
Accession of Serbia to the European Union and
Accession of Macedonia to the European Union. Does anyone have thoughts on the best approach? Here are some sources:
[1][2][3]
My suggestion would be to add the following sentence to the last paragraph of the lede section: "
Serbia and
Macedonia are both candidates for European Union membership, but they face similar challenges to those of Croatia had to overcome in its ascension." —Zujine|
talk16:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)reply
You shouldn't start with the lead section in any case. First add an "Impact" or "Aftermath" section that describes what the sources say in a modicum of detail, and only then consider summarizing that part in the lead - if it's significant enough. --
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
18:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on
2013 enlargement of the European Union. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
In the statistics section of this article’s infobox the part showing Croatia’s gdp per capita isn’t properly formatted and the coding, {{{national_gdp_ppp_per_capita}}}, is exposed. I’m not keen in Wikipedia formatting so I wanted to alert this to those who are and who are able to fix this.