From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Zwerg Nase (
talk ·
contribs)
13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
I'll review this one.
Zwerg Nase (
talk)
13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
The following needs to be taken care of:
- Prologue: The first paragraph needs sources, both for the course and the statement of the expected times.
- Stage 6: were as one again, not long later sounds really weird, maybe you can find a better wording?
- The references to the Team Sky website are dead, please find a replacement or archived links here.
That's about it. Good job so far!
Zwerg Nase (
talk)
22:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- All taken care of, hopefully.
Craig
(talk)
22:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Looks good, it's a pass! :)
Zwerg Nase (
talk)
07:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
reply