This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2010 in spaceflight article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2010 in spaceflight's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "MSDB":
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:50, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Is this information correct about the Vega Rocket Launch in November 2010? On the Cubesat website [1] it says this launch is happening in 2009 Awally88 ( talk) 06:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Link 15 on this page doesn't work ("ESA Announces Vega CubeSat Selection". Education Office. European Space Agency. 2008-06-07. http://www.esa.int/esaED/SEM2BPUG3HF_index_0.html. Retrieved 2008-07-23.) Just seeing if anyone else can find if that link still exists, I haven't been able to find it so far but will keep looking. Awally88 ( talk) 05:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
It seems this launch has been delayed until mid-march 2010, please refer to < http://space.skyrocket.de/index_frame.htm?http://www.skyrocket.de/space/doc_chr/lau2010.htm> or to < http://www.spaceflightnow.com/tracking/> Stefritz ( talk) 09:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
If this is suborbital, someone should add: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gIyJwTWQjzwLtHke9NhVHNS7qiHQ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.20.6 ( talk) 16:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
As can be read at the Public sector space agencies template talk page the EU flag shouldn't be used as ESA flag as some countries of the latter don't participate in the former and both are unrelated organisations. Tom Paine ( talk) 19:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
From this article, it seems that there are some missile launches that are not included on this list. I do not know if these target missiles were capable of reaching "space", but it presents an interesting case: What to do when the target missile is attempting to complete it's ascent, but the test is designed to destroy it before it does. Other failed launches are still included on this list.-- SkiDragon ( talk) 02:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
The article on the Minitour IV states that the 4/22 was a success, bu the article on 2010 in spaceflight says it was a spacecraft failure. Which was it/ user:mnw2000 00:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Why is the table of contents placed in the middle of the article, rather than near the top as in most Wikipedia articles? N2e ( talk) 23:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
toclimit|limit=2}}
template, which not only restricts the depth of heading that is shown in the TOC, but it also forces the position of the TOC. It went in with
this edit; sections started to be added above it with
this edit. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
12:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Because the end of the space shuttle has been delayed until next year, the picture about the shuttle ending in 2010 needs to be changed, along with lots of text throughout the article. In place of the picture, maybe there could be the Falcon 9, the Dragon, the SDO, or something else of the sort. 66.67.22.212 ( talk) 19:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Section needs adjusting, I think, for the delay of STS-134 to 2011-02-26. And I think Vega is now next year. 82.163.24.100 ( talk) 10:35, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
It is not part of the Angara family. The first stage is a Universal Rocket (modified with lower thrust engine) which is used in the Angara family. However the NARO should not be considered part of the Angara family, nor should it be considered Russian. It would be like considering the Atlas V to be a Saturn IB launch vehicle because they both use a Centaur second stage. -- 71.214.237.152 ( talk) 21:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
What is the source for the 30 September Oko launch? Offliner ( talk) 15:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't this one be mentioned with it's failed 5 september launch?-- Narayan ( talk) 11:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Today's Bulava launch was successful: [5]. For some, I'm unable to add this without breaking the syntax. Offliner ( talk) 09:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Other sources give November 4th, about 14:02 UT (ERT??). 82.163.24.100 ( talk) 16:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Should Helen (2?) launch be mentioned since its altitude was 40km [6](so not a spaceflight)? Fact sheet will also need changing 86.41.38.9 ( talk) 22:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
According to the latest statement, the launch should still take place in December. Offliner ( talk) 15:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
No news has been received yet regarding preparations for the launch of Iran's Simorgh rocket. Is it possible that the delay in the maiden flight of Simorgh could be influenced by Western pressure on Iran not to launch the rocket, since Simorgh has the potential to be used as an ICBM? 68.4.61.237 ( talk) 23:12, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
What's this? Space Shuttle, Delta IV Heavy, Falcon 9, and Atlas V all being launched from KSC, Cape Carnival in November. Might be possible that all four are on launch pads at the same time. Likely you'll see at least two. -- 71.214.211.224 ( talk) 00:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
As far as I can see, the helen 2 rocket did not reach space. An altitude of 40 km is mentioned in various sites, for example [1]. But only rockets reaching 100 km are supposed to be included here. RubenGarciaHernandez ( talk) 21:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
References
First US Army satellite in 50 years: Army nanosatellite on first flight, was one of the nano-payloads on Dragon C1 yesterday. Is this sort of thing worth mentioning? I don't know, but I could not find it on Wikipedia: SMDC-ONE. "the first U.S. Army-built satellite in more than 50 years. U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command is the Army lead for the SMDC-ONE nanosatellite program." Cheers. N2e ( talk) 18:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
The first sentence is due for refurbishment. None of those are now expected, because all have happened. 82.163.24.100 ( talk) 12:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
I wonder what happened with the last planned launch for 2010 : suborbital CanadaBlack Brant IX from White Sands? I was not able to find information on that. Did it happen? If it did not, we should consider removing it from the article. BloodIce ( talk) 17:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. It seems that Nanosail-D might not be dead after all. Ejection was confirmed Jan. 19, 2011 [1], and chances are it is still alive and may carry the mission out. It is transmitting a radio beacon [2] and is supposed to unfurl the sail soon. RubenGarciaHernandez ( talk) 21:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
References
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 01:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
2010 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on 2010 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on 2010 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on 2010 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://sched.wff.nasa.gov/wffsched/ViewItem.html?detail=0&integral=0&dropdown=1&show_stop=0&show_resources=0&style_sheet=style_wallops.css&dtwhen=2455320&cal_item_id=6263{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/files/usaf-ccafs-90-day-schedule-09-2009-1.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2010/1207-ss-bsat.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)