This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
There are no confirmed cases in Ukraine. See http://www.rbc.ua/rus/newsline/2009/06/01/550048.shtml Solar Apex ( talk) 13:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
A seperate Thailand article should be created. The main article is getting far too large and unruly. Johnpacklambert ( talk) 17:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I think that this article is getting too long, and i think it would be better if we start creating new articles about each country, instead of adding more information at each section. There are 18 articles for 18 different countries in the Spanish Wikipedia, like Germany, South Korea, Chile, Panama, Peru etc, and maybe some one can translate those articles, at least the countries with the most cases into English. -- Vrysxy! ( talk) 06:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Can someone make a death totals map like the confirmed cases totals map (pink map) ?
Suggest:
70.29.208.129 ( talk) 12:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
A Mexican deaths map is now available: File:H1N1 Mexico deaths.svg — 70.29.208.129 ( talk) 12:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Can someone make a counterpart map for cases by type for this file ( file:SWINE Flue in Asia.PNG)? (The black-red-yellow maps)
70.29.208.129 ( talk) 08:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Since the article has become one of the longest in the whole Wikipedia, taking too much time to load, I suggest to remove all the country maps (those showing the distribution of cases within the country) from the article (with the possible exception of the "big three" Canada, US, Mexico). Only the "continent" maps should remain, IMO.
We could move the country maps to the corresponding individual country articles or replace them by a wikilink to the same map. This way one needs not load all the dozens of maps when reading or editing part of the article.-- Roentgenium111 ( talk) 00:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Currently about half this article is on Europe, and the majority of the rest is on Central America / Caribbean... so if someone could start the split on these two regions... 70.29.208.129 ( talk) 08:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Since the data by country is being transported to other articles I believe this article should be called "2009 swine flu outbreak by CONTINENT" also the term "swine flu" should be replaced with "A(H1/N1) flu". And just as a suggestion there should be a table indicating the number of cases and deaths by continent. Tony0106 ( talk) 18:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
If the data on these continents has been split into the corresponding continent articles, they should be deleted here as soon as possible. -- Roentgenium111 ( talk) 21:30, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I created the European page I wanted to delete it from the main article but I don't wanna violate any rules, for removing sources, and having my account blocked for a day. So if anyone know the correct procedure to delete the sources and summarize the section it would be appreciated. Thanks. Tony0106 ( talk) 22:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a brewing issue HERE about which countries to include and where: namely, Turkey, Cyprus, some ex-Soviet republics, and Israel?! Please comment there. Thanks! Bosonic dressing ( talk) 19:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
I think the chapter on Asia should be shortened now it has an own article, it's by far the longest. I realise Asia is the largest continent, but it is the continent with the least number of cases (except Africa). Even Oceania has more cases. Thus I think the chapter should definitely be shorter than that on North America, say. -- Roentgenium111 ( talk) 11:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I think the length of the Asia section is fine. As home to 60% of the world's population, there is a lot to say about it. Each country only has a few sentences. What would you take out? Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
"Hong Kong also became one of the first jurisdictions to declare the swine flu as a notifiable disease, and much of the procedures against the spread of the swine flu were learned from the 2003 SARS outbreak, of which Hong Kong was the epicenter of the outbreak"
Epicentre = the point from which an infestation begins and radiates.
I just checked the Wikipedia article on SARS and it states SARS started in Guangdong, China. The deathtoll in China was even higher than that of Hong Kong.
I suggest removing the mentioning of the 'epicentre' - it's misleading people to think that the virus started in Hong Kong, when in fact it started in Guangdong, China. -- Platinum inc ( talk) 19:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
According to the reference, this 'designation' has been given to Melbourne by 'The Australian' newspaper. The Australian doesn't appear to be quoting any official source, and so this designation 'as the swine flu capital of the world' is merely editorial on their behalf (based on the per capita infection rate), and as such should not be written up as 'fact' in the way it has. I've modified the comment as such. 121.44.156.246 ( talk) 17:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Please see Talk:2009_flu_pandemic_in_Asia#Country_inclusions_(Europe/Asia) where there is an ongoing discussion on which articles countries should be placed. Countries like the Mediterranean islands, Turkey, Russia, Caucuses nations, etc. 70.29.212.226 ( talk) 07:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
What's up with Africa? It hasn't been split, so why was it reduced? 70.29.210.174 ( talk) 04:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
This article only talks about the continents themself, so doesn't should be 2009 flu pandemic by continent? João P. M. Lima ( talk) 18:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
ok :) cheers João P. M. Lima ( talk) 11:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
this section uses citation to other wikipedia articles, which cant be used as a citation on wikipedia, plus the populations are cited, while the other colmns of the tables are not, I ll try to work on it for a while, using citation to the latest who report here, and the population citation should be changed to other reference, maybe CIA fact book, thank you :-) MaenK.A. Talk 08:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
A zoonosis map is now available. 70.29.212.226 ( talk) 08:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
H1N1 map by confirmed deaths.svg needs an update for the Chilean death. 70.29.208.129 ( talk) 06:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Done
Can someone update this world map for deaths, for the Dominican Republic? 70.29.208.129 ( talk) 08:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC) Done
Can someone update the world map for deaths, for Colombia? 70.29.210.174 ( talk) 06:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Done
Can someone update the world deaths map for the June 10 death in Guatamala? 70.29.210.174 ( talk) 06:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Done
So can someone add Scotland to the deaths map for June 14? 70.29.212.226 ( talk) 04:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Done
Someone needs to update the map to take account of the death in Argentina. 70.29.212.226 ( talk) 03:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC) Done
An update should be done for:
70.29.212.226 ( talk) 07:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
{{ reqmap}}
Can someone create a pink map for Africa, and a black-red-yellow map for Africa? 70.29.212.226 ( talk) 08:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Done
The maps of Argentina contain Antarctica... but AFAIK, Argentina respects the Antarctic treaty, is a treaty member, etc... Why does the map contain Antarctica then?
And Antarctica is colored in, does anyone have information on confirmed cases in Antarctica?
70.29.212.226 ( talk) 08:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Examining the maps which are currently generated for the articles (these are fantastic BTW) sort of gives an alarming picture for parts of the world where large populations exist; as it denotes number of cases above certain thresholds. Are there any schools of thought to create maps noting per capita rates, as it becomes much clearer as to the infection rates and risks? -- HJKeats ( talk) 13:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I made the Oceania map and H1n1 Africa Map is avaliable too.-- Vrysxy! ( talk) 04:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
As this article has grown and developed, subarticles for countries and continents/regions have also been developed. Consequently, this article no longer deals with the former in abundance but moreso the latter, with much of the article organised in a continental/regional context. So, I propose it be moved to one of:
I prefer the former, as the latter can be interpreted to be vague. (As for Oceania, see that article.) Thoughts? Bosonic dressing ( talk) 10:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Can the various community outbreak maps have their colours harmonized?
How about additing in all countries with confirmed infections, and adding a second color for "isolated infections" ?
76.66.193.20 ( talk) 06:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
The Philippines map combines community outbreaks into the regular red/yellow/black map. Perhaps we should do that with the community outbreak maps? 70.29.208.69 ( talk) 22:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
File:H1N1 South America Map.svg is closing on being completely black, can someone convert this to first level national subdivisions mapping, like the North America map? 70.29.208.69 ( talk) 05:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Akimiski Island is the wrong colour, it should be the same as Nunavut, instead it's the same as Ontario.
70.29.208.69 ( talk) 21:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus to move. I can see both sides but there doesn't seem to a consensus to move at this time (plus there are those pesky tables at the top of the article!) -- RegentsPark ( sticks and stones) 00:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
100.000+ cases in Argentina? Felipe Menegaz 15:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
It's on RTE, a North Korean Communist party official has just died of Mexican swine flu!.-- Qministrator ( talk) 18:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC) -- Qministrator ( talk) 18:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
2 are infected on the island [ [1]].-- 86.25.9.212 ( talk) 11:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Why is Antarctica on these maps? There have been no reported deaths or cases in Antarctica, yet it is colored black/pink. And Chile is a signatory to the Antarctic Treaty staying its claim to Antarctica.
70.29.208.69 ( talk) 07:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
The table The ten countries with most confirmed cases per capita, should have a ratio of 1:100,000 as it artificially inflates the number of cases higher than the actual number for countries with populations below 1,000,000. -- HJKeats ( talk) 13:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I just deleted 2 tables that were grossly inaccurate. I could not see a way of correcting the tables without Original research.
The first table had a column header entitled "mortality rate". Mortality rate refers to total deaths/total population and is normally calculated on an annual basis for the flu. Seeing as we know neither the total deaths and pandemic has not lasted more than a year we cannot calculate this figure.
The header to this table refers to confirmed deaths/confirmed infections. This is not a meaningful figure as neither figure can be used to estimate total deaths or total infections. Furthermore comparing different countries on the basis of this quantity is not meaningful as differing detections methodologies are in use in different countries. This cannot be resolved without original research.
The second table is titled "Top 13 countries, deaths per millon inhabitants (as of July 14 2009)" but it lists only confirmed deaths (which does not estimate total deaths as the CDC has observed). Furthermore it has a Deaths per million column. Again we have no reliable data for this figure, again this confirmed deaths per million is not a meaningful quantity and again comparing countries on the basis of confirmed deaths per million is not meaningful. Finally this also cannot be resolved without original research. Barnaby dawson ( talk) 21:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, thats right. A motality rate of 5% in Jamaica is a joke. This land does not have the resources for testing. =This table must be more explained to the wiki-reader.
Bad english IP-Editor 93.131.22.196 ( talk) 01:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Mariordo has reverted my deletions suggesting a discussion should occur first. In light of Mariodo's comments I will not immediately delete these tables. However, I'm still convinced these tables have no place in an encyclopedia without a source for the tables (not just individual numbers within them).
To anyone who has any objections to the deletion of these tables please explain why they should remain (or indeed anyone who wants to discuss the matter). In particular I would like an explanation of either why they are not inaccurate or how they might be changed in such a way that they would be notable, accurate and not original research. I won't take any further action on the page until other users have had time to consider the matter. Barnaby dawson ( talk) 11:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
If tomorrow I still see no convincing argument in favour of keeping these tables I will delete them. Barnaby dawson ( talk) 11:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree totally with Barnaby dawson. WAS 4.250 ( talk) 17:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I will delete the first of the two tables in question (the second table in the overview section) as there has been no attempt to justify its presence. I will wait another few days for further discussion of the second table in question before taking any action regarding it. Barnaby dawson ( talk) 08:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
It's now been another few days. I will delete the second of these two tables tomorrow assuming no compelling argument is given against. I also formally invite people to justify why the remaining table in this section is notable (credible source required that treats confirmed cases per 100,000 inhabitants as a meaningful figure). I'll give until the weekend for thoughts on that one. Barnaby dawson ( talk) 15:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help), it states the international guidelines to classify deaths. Also:
"reported deaths are deaths where pandemic influenza or its complications are the primary cause of death". New Zealand Ministry of Health. July 22nd 2009. {{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)Even if numbers are not equally accurate or absolutely comparable, a guide will always be better than nothing. Rankings are not always definitive, is not a matter of who is the champion of flu, it´s a guide. If you prefer walking in the dark do so, but why condemn everyone to do so? Acolombo1 ( talk) 13:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, now we´ve got the Chilean health ministry reporting the deaths per 100,000 rate in a table for their different regions
"Influenza Pandémica 2009 - Reporte Semanal" (PDF) (in Spanish). Health Ministry of Chile. July 30th 2009. {{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help). Furthermore, if you have a look at
Pandemics#Pandemics and notable epidemics through history, most of the pandemics are evaluated primarily regarding deaths as compared to total population. The deaths per millon or per 100,000 table cannot be objected then. I do object the cases per 100,000 table, as many have done in this thread. The current overview is misleading, so I will do my best to correct it.
Acolombo1 (
talk)
22:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Can someone explain this "Estimated Cases" column that has suddenly appeared?? If we're still arguing over the "Confirmed" cases, what source and accuracy is there for this wild speculation on possible, unproven cases?? Removing it until such claims can be documented. Kf6spf ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC).
This section was recently added. (I suppose it should read "confirmed community outbreaks"?) Can someone provide references for the given list of countries? Also, why add such a list when there is already a map directly above it presenting the same data visually? -- Roentgenium111 ( talk) 16:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
4 are ill in Botswana and 2 are ill in the Faeroe Islands [ [2]]. -- 86.29.135.76 ( talk) 18:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
This is not really about this article but it is a call for help on a related article, influenza prevention. My hope is to eventually have this article put into the "In the News" section, but it does not yet have appropriate content nor is it of high enough quality. I would like a consensus for this article and experienced editors to improve it. Any helpful edits to this article are greatly beneficial. Thank you. Sagan666 ( talk) 00:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
New Zealand is not part of Australia. Why is it under the same heading? 118.208.191.120 ( talk) 09:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
I recently noticed the death total is now '3533'. The lasted time I've looked, it was 3611, there must of have been a mistake or something?
I have noticed that Brazil has almost gained 1000 deaths from this. Maybe we can find out why that is?
( TheGreenwalker ( talk) 18:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC))
Hello, is there another place for confirmed deaths in the UK only here? ( 194.83.131.4 ( talk) 13:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC))
Number of deaths for Brazil and USA are very suspicious. For example, CDC states in its report that causes of deaths from last week are Influenza and Pneumonia Syndrome [3], not just Influenza A(H1N1). So, the number is overestemated.
Nikolamilevski ( talk) 15:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I know this is random, but what has the death toll have to be for it to be a real concern to health? Because there has only been 4,000 deaths. ( TheGreenwalker ( talk) 19:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC))
...the total of
1. 641 = the last recorded number on the 2009 US swine flu outbreak table [4]. This is the sum of all STATE-REPORTED H1N1 deaths up through today, September 15, 2009;
...and...
2. 196 = U.S. Influenza and Pneumonia-Associated Hospitalizations and Deaths from August 30 – September 5, 2009 [5]. This is the one week total compiled by the US CDC, over and above the total reported by the states. 99% of all current flu strains in the US are H1N1, so it's safe to say that all current US flu deaths are H1N1. Additionally, pneumonia is much more widespread during the winter months, making the current one-week spike reported by the CDC to be very interesting, to say the least.
This gives a current grand total of 837 H1N1 deaths.
Finally, the US media is reporting multiple H1N1 deaths on a daily basis, numbers that don't seem to be reflected in the state-reported totals noted above.
Please change the US H1N1 deaths to reflect the correct number, and please stop bouncing back and forth every time someone complains when the deaths appear to be going too high.
Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluwatcher2009 ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
On the green globe map, it states 1 million. I not too sure, but it should be checked out, thanks. ( TheGreenwalker ( talk) 18:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC))
a lot of the maps use the same colour in REALLY CLOSE to the same shade for two figures in the same map such as north america for 100+ and 500+ this makes it unusefull-- 209.181.16.93 ( talk) 16:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
No, I mean it looks like (on the green map) it has been vandalised. Take a look and you will see what I mean. ( TheGreenwalker ( talk) 22:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC))
Per [6] should be added to the map. Edison ( talk) 21:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Your site is claiming 724 US deaths based on numbers being reported by each of the US states. That number is now in question and should be corrected to reflect the NEW reporting format now required by the US CDC.
The new format is now including ALL influenza and pneumonia-associated hospitalizations and deaths. Because 99% of all current influenza is considered to be the H1N1 virus, it is safe to say that at least 99% of the current numbers being reported to, and by, the US CDC are H1N1 in origin.
As we all know, the US CDC reported 593 total deaths from the H1N1 virus under the OLD reporting format on 8/30/2009. [7]
On 9/5/2009, the US CDC reported 196 total deaths from the H1N1 virus under the NEW reporting format. That total is in addition to the numbers reported on 8/30/2009. Logically then, the total of US H1N1 deaths on 9/5/2009 was 789. [8]
On 9/12/2009, the US CDC reported 168 additional deaths from the H1N1 virus under the NEW reporting format. That total is in addition to the numbers reported on 8/30/2009 and 9/5/2009. Therefore, the total of US H1N1 deaths on 9/12/2009 was 957. [9]
On 9/19/2009, the US CDC reported 572 additional deaths from the H1N1 virus under the NEW reporting format. That total is in addition to the numbers reported on 8/30/2009, 9/5/2009, and 9/18/2009. Therefore, the total of US H1N1 deaths on 9/18/2009 was 1,529. [10]
Fluwatcher2009 ( talk) 05:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
The UK is now vacinating 14 million people. Should we include this? ( TheGreenwalker ( talk) 15:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC))
213.79.89.74 ( talk) added the following
Two women diagnosed with swine flu have died...
More than 1,300 confirmed swine flu cases across Russia as of October 26...
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20091027/156601587.html
to this talk page, and was reverted as "unsourced" by Zhang He ( talk · contribs). What I believe the anonymous IP meant to say was that he thinks the above info belongs in the article. Any comments on whether it does? Gabbe ( talk) 12:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm gonna quote BILD-Zeitung: "Die Schweinegrippe breitet sich drastisch aus! Neue Horrorzahlen aus dem Ausland zeigen das Ausmaß der Seuche: England meldet 78 000 Neuansteckungen binnen einer Woche, Schweden 80 000 Fälle. Mittlerweile sind fünf Millionen Amerikaner mit dem H1N1-Virus infiziert. In Norwegen gibt es bereits 14 Tote, in Italien starben an nur einem Tag vier Menschen. Weltweit gab es laut Weltgesundheitsorganisation 700 neue Schweinegrippe-Todesfälle in nur einer Woche"
So they have much higher numbers than Wikipedia. I am not sure if they are right, but one should check that. -- 95.90.53.66 ( talk) 13:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Guys, have you read the article you referenced? 80.000 is a ridiculous number given only 3-4 days of fist AH1/N1 sights here. To clarify, 80.000 is a number of all flu cases both seasonal and pandemic, because the president giving the speech haven't focused any attention on this fact. I'll go find some more realistic data. Elf-Eluna-Alina ( talk) 15:00, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Ukraine is missing in the "Overview" table, with about 40 cases per 10,000 inhabitants.-- Roentgenium111 ( talk) 14:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Slovakia haven't confirmed the first death yet. [11] -- 78.99.84.36 ( talk) 18:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
So far as I can gather from a quick scan of the article, Australia has experienced relatively significant impact yet is not individually represented the way other regions are; it should be. Thanks, Abrazame ( talk) 05:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Numbers in the columns "Cases" and "Deaths" should be officialy, laboratory confirmed. Number of over 800,000 cases in Ukraine is about ILI cases. I recomend adding a new column about number of ILI cases and of "probable" deaths.
Nikolamilevski (
talk)
16:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Guys, can we come to some agreement about how the numbers for the Ukraine are going to be reported instead of this constant bouncing back and forth between 14 and 100 plus? Hullexile ( talk) 12:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
The numbers of Ukraina, according to Ukraina are hugely diffrent then the numbers on Wikipedia:
http://www.moz.gov.ua/ua/main/press/?docID=14094. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Dnclone (
talk •
contribs)
23:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Boing, boing, the Ukraine yoyo continues. Hullexile ( talk) 02:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Whatever there is in Ukraine has killed at least 315 people in a couple weeks. It doesn't seem plausible that it's anything other than H1N1. CDC has not been tracking any seasonal influenza in Europe and the other explanations are absurd (Russian bioweapon) or stupid (pneumonic plague). Samples of the bug are supposedly being tested now, so that should be resolved soon.
Do H1N1 mutations still count as H1N1 deaths? 24.241.225.183 ( talk) 03:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Agreed, the vast majority of these deaths are undoubtedly due to H1N1 (or possibly a mutation of it) as there is very little seasonal flu going round. Some will be due to other ILI but to state the number of deaths as 15 seems doubtful. However, I would rather we stuck to one figure be it the higher Ukrainian Government figure or the lower ECDC figure rather than this constant up and down. Can the people who are changing the figure every day come on here and argue their case? Hullexile ( talk) 04:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
The numbers of officialy confirmed cases for swine flu in France and Italy are very suspicious and probably wrong. Plese somebody to check them.
Nikolamilevski ( talk) 21:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Omitted from wikipedia's table, though. This official document from health authorities, dated 7. aug 2009 states "Nú hava íalt 44 fólk fingið staðfest krímsjúkuna H1N1 í Føroyum." [12]
Rough translation goes "A total number of 44 people have been confirmed H1N1 infected in Faeroe Islands"
Celvin11 20. nov 2009 19:32 CET —Preceding undated comment added 18:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC).
According to local paper, Svalbardposten (in an article dated 20. nov 2009), "Det er så langt påvist seks tilfeller av svineinfluensa på øya." Rough transdlation goes "So far, six cases of swine flu have been established on the island" Source: [13]
Celvin11 20. nov 2009 20:04 CET —Preceding undated comment added 19:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC).
From Radio e Televisione della Repubblica di San Marino 5 Nov 2009 "Influenza A/H1N1: primo caso in Repubblica" source: [14]
Celvin11 20. nov 2009 20:36 CET —Preceding undated comment added 19:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC).
Especially concerning the number of cases. Since this summer, the WHO ask the governments to stop counting each cases. BUT the template and the list of countries most affected keep the idea of "Confirmed cases", which is highly inaccurate now. Number of case have been estimated 22 millions in USA, nearly 2 millions in France, hundred of thousand in Spain, Germany, UK, etc... We should delete everything that dealing with "Confirmed cases" and change it with "Estimated cases". Because now, except for the death numbers, the confirmed cases number will stay frozen since this summer. Kormin ( talk) 11:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
According to the table Italy has 3,064,933 confirmed cases. Italy's population is 59,854,860. This is about 53 cases in 1000, making it number one. However, Italy is not in the top 10 table on the left. Wallie ( talk) 02:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Why isn't the mutation image that I updated, well, updated? Rory Re loaded 10:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Trying to find out the total number of reported deaths from h1n1 is difficult as the updates are mere estimates ,WHO Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 currentley reports aprox. 8768 deaths however in reasearching many articales , the numbers are much higher than that , for example THE ASSOCIATED PRESS-US now estimates that 50 million Americans have had swine flu, and 10,000 died from it---The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)Bi-weekly and cumulative number of deaths due to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009, by province/territory, Canada, as of December 10, 2009, 11h00 EDT 373 and many more country.s have been reporting deaths as well, with just 2 countries mentioned here the death toll is over 10373 Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 by country reports a total of 11,808 , so all the mumbers are not updated , i expect it is much higher than what is posted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scissorsshelly11 ( talk • contribs) 10:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
How come the chart has not been updated since August??? Isn't it important to chart the slow down of the spreading? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.216.48 ( talk) 13:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Yogiudo ( talk) 17:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. -- Mkativerata ( talk) 20:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
The 2009 pandemic refers to the disease strain, it does not have to have been contracted in 2009. This article and its related sub-articles need serious updating. Depaending on which chart one consults there were either about 1000 deaths in India or 1400. With most of this disease gone by 8 months ago it would be assumed a definitive answer can now be found. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 07:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
2009 flu pandemic by country. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 12 external links on
2009 flu pandemic by country. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 6 external links on
2009 flu pandemic by country. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 17 external links on 2009 flu pandemic by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.influenza.be/nl/_documents/2010-02-25%20Persbericht%20122%20week%2006_07.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.elcomercio.com.pe/noticia/288650/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.flucount.org/When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)