![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 2008 Senior Worlds in Canada were never the most attended IIHF event. The record is held by the 2004 Worlds in Prague and Ostrava with about 50 000 more. So I will have to cut that reference to the 2009 WJC being the second most attended IIHF event ever behind the 2008 Senior Worlds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SD3107E ( talk • contribs) 17:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Are there any references to the group A and group B line ups? ccwaters ( talk) 14:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Tie breakers are documented here: [1] ccwaters ( talk) 17:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Given those tiebreakers, Germany isn't QUITE done yet. Despite the fact that it's unlikely, should the Kazakhs beat the Czechs by 4 goals (or by 3 in a scoreline lower than 5-2), the Germans advance. Wjmorris3 ( talk) 04:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Something is wrong I think, it seems highly unlikely that teams from the same group will play eachother again as it is represented now. As Latvia is already put on one loss, I assume the matches from the first round count too, so the match vs 5A (whoever that is) is already played. Probably the matches on January 4th need to be 4B vs Latvia (5B) and 4A vs 5A, so that all teams have played eachother once. -- Pelotas talk 14:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
If Kazakhstan does not earn at least a point in today's game with Finland, they will be relegated. There will be no way mathematically for them to stay in the top division. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.95.36.125 (
talk)
14:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I take that back, there would be one possibility where the winners of the games are FIN/KAZ -- GER/FIN -- LAT/KAZ. In this case, it would be a three-way tie for the 2-4 spots and it would come down to goal differential. 68.95.36.125 ( talk) 14:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)68.95.36.125