This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
The "Media coverage" section lists only TV rights holders. What about radio (and for that matter, online and mobile) coverage? Here in England there doesn't seem to be any - the BBC certainly haven't got it, which doesn't please me too much - but is that the case everywhere else as well?
Loganberry (
Talk) 14:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Following up my own question, there does appear to be a commercial offering of streaming audio commentary on Cricinfo, albeit not available in certain countries, but no traditional radio coverage anywhere in the world (that I've found).
Loganberry (
Talk) 16:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)reply
There is live radio coverage in
UAE through radio channel 106.2 Hum FM. I should list that. Also Willow.tv is showing the matches online, of course, for a fee.
Sherenk (
talk) 03:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I don't really see the point of having warm-up match details or scorecards on this page. They don't really contribute anything, take up far too much space and have too many red links. At the very least, create a "hide" box around them so that they can be hidden from view or make a separate article.
Sherenk (
talk) 05:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)reply
They should have a seperate articles. Aaroncrick (talk) 07:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)reply
West Indies not eliminated
Un-red-highlighting West Indies since they can still theoretically proceed, if India and Pakistan both beat Australia, then West Indies totally thrashes India.
Pirsq (
talk) 16:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Agreed. Only England is confirmed in qualifying for the semis.
Sherenk (
talk) 04:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Someone added "West Indies eliminated as a result" after the second match. I've moved that two matches lower, as West Indies were theoretically still in the running until the end of the Australia-India match.
Pirsq (
talk) 03:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Tied on points
South Africa needed 313 or so to get ahead of Sri Lanka to retain hope of qualifying for the next round. Anyone know a source for the rules related to run rate (or whatever it is) used to separate sides?
Tsinfandel (
talk) 21:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)reply
England shouldn't be down as B1 yet for the semis. NZ could win and get better nrr. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.3.190.54 (
talk) 12:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Bowling economy rate
Since when was economy rate more important than bowling average? This ain't T20. Then why is economy being listed ahead of average in the bowling leaders table?
Question
Why do my edits keep getting removed? I don't see why using initials is better than full names, can somebody explain?
79.71.133.11 (
talk) 22:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)reply