This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Curling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
curling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CurlingWikipedia:WikiProject CurlingTemplate:WikiProject CurlingCurling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
There's an asterisk next to Monique Gagnier's name, but it's not defined. Does she throw skip rocks, or does it mean something else?
C.Fred02:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Thanks a lot KelvSC. I know there's not supposed to be any personal attacks, but this is ridiculous. The page is a mess with all your damn templates for deletion notices. Thanks a lot jerk. --Earl Andrew -
talk03:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Yes there is. It's hard to find though. Thanks for cleaning the page up though. I have a question, do you like the table with the teams on this page better or the one on the
2005 Scott Tournament of Hearts page. I have been arguing with KelvSC for quite some time about it, and I want to see what someone else thinks. --Earl Andrew -
talk05:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)reply
My only complaint with the '05-formatted table is alignment: if you get a long curling club (or two), it throws the rest of the lines out of alignment, so leads, skips, etc. don't line up across the rows. If that could be fixed, it would be better—and, if the colours came from approximations of the uniform colours, so much the better. Kelv's formatting for the table in '06 leads to a lot of situation where names are split onto two lines, which I feel is an even worse issue. I guess if I had to vote right now, it'd be weak '05. :) —C.Fred (
talk)
00:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Image:Scottlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
fair use but there is no
explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
fair use.
Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a
fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.