This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
No review from Reliable source for both the manga & the OVA. Very problematic because it's a series licensed in 3 others languages from Japanese so reviews should be less scars —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
KrebMarkt (
talk •
contribs) 17:01, 19 August 2009
I'm pushed the torture up 12nd page of the Google results and nothing worth RS. I'm not voicing to have it deleted but rather raising the need attention flag. My feeling for this one is frustration :p
o_O 12 pages?! Did you only search in English, though?
And yeah, I think probably better than 60% of the stuff we have that's start- and stub-class either needs to be merged, can't establish notability, or is otherwise in dire need of work. 「
ダイノガイ千?!」? ·
Talk⇒Dinoguy100021:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Must try with German & Italian only restriction but when you click too much on next results you start having those in other languages :p
All right, hopefully you'll turn up some stuff. In the meantime, maybe I should poke Collectonian to get the obligatory
Manga: The Complete Guide review/information. And it's good, I think, that we're more hesitant to delete English-licensed stuff, regardless of the reasons - certainly, there are plenty of series that are non-notable in spite of being licensed in English, but there are also a good number that are barely notable, or that gain notability over time due to sudden attention being paid to them for some reason. 「
ダイノガイ千?!」? ·
Talk⇒Dinoguy100019:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
An early hard sci-fi work that doesn't state what it specifically covers? I see mention that it deals with suspended animation and interstellar travel, but what else? What makes these things worth knowing about is how different cultures reacted and dealt with new ideas. So what are the new ideas that it covers?
It would go a long way towards it's notability if it was, say, a 1980's example of a space elevator.
199.241.14.253 (
talk)
19:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
2001 Nights. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.