![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
The Amnesty International article is dated 15 June 2000, when details were unclear. Since then it has become clear that the perpetrators were militants. The Indian Express article (dated May 19, 2006) reports that Clinton wrongly said that the killings were done by Hindu militants. It doesn't help to cite an outdated source in the article when newer ones exist. -- vi5in [talk] 04:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[1], [2]. Doldrums 14:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I have added info about Suhail Malik of sialkot pakistan who confessed to Barry Bearak of New York Times Wikireader41 ( talk) 00:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
@ Gotitbro:: Re. the source you removed [3] complaining about "unknown Sikh News", a quick Google search for Sikh News Express returns a well maintained website [4], a frequently updated fb page [5] as well as an entry in the registry held by the Office of Registrar of Newspapers for India [6]. So, SNE clearly is a legally operating newspaper in India. I am not aware of any red lights re. its reputation - could you explain why you believe it should not be used as a source for Wikipedia, especially when the information I proposed to add can be cross-checked with a video recording?
Also, re. your complaint that Countercurrents is not "neutral" [7], I suggest you read WP:BIASEDSOURCE. Regards, — kashmīrī TALK 13:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)