![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Orders of magnitude (length) Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Orders of magnitude (length) |
![]() | The contents of the 1 kilometre page were merged into Orders of magnitude (length) on 13 July 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
If you're going to be renaming articles, wouldn't 1E+3 m make more sense than 1 E 3 m? (Or has this already been discussed somewhere and I didn't notice?) -- Brion 21:42 Aug 20, 2002 (PDT)
What's with all the Scandinavians and their mountains? <g> -- John Owens 10:45 Mar 28, 2003 (UTC)
It might be nice to have a separate pages for elevation, but once we can link geographic coordinates, there may be no need for them. --User:Docu
As you may have guessed if you've seen any of the other pages where I've done this organizing, if you really care, feel free to re-add any of these. JesseW 23:15, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
It would seem as if all the information on this home page is from the same web page: http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/1-E3-m. I'm not sure what that has to say about credibility, but I guess it's worth thinking about Erufailon42 ( talk) 13:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Looks like this article has enough citations, so why keep the old template? Astatine211 Talk 18:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)