![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have just completed the B class checklist and feel that this article could be improved by addressing the following:
Just a few ideas. Once you feel it is ready, you might like to seek re-assessment by including the article name on the list at WP:MHA. Also, if you would like more detailed feedback, this can be obtained by including the article on the list at WP:MHPR. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert ( talk) 06:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
As mentioned
above, "Battle" is pushing it a bit; the two articles in the See Also list were bigger affairs, yet were only termed "incidents". Unless there are any objections I would propose to move this page to
Yeosu incident. Thoughts?
Xyl 54 (
talk)
01:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
PS: The same probably goes for the other post-armistice engagements listed in the
naval engagements template. Three of them are titled "Battle", but none of them were more than a skirmish.
Xyl 54 (
talk)
01:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I viewed the Korean version of this page, and it provides additional sources and details. I've translated the Korean article into English and am in the process of verifying sources. There's a few other online archives that I have in mind that might have a bit more information. I intend to overhaul this page as soon as I feel comfortable with my draft and the sources. I've been itching to research and write something and this was the first Korea-related page I saw that was listed as needing some work. Irojyo ( talk) 02:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)