This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Tropical cyclone scales#South-Western Indian Ocean|tropical cyclones]] The anchor (#South-Western Indian Ocean) has been
deleted by other users before.
[[Tropical cyclone scales#South-Western Indian Ocean|tropical cyclone status]] The anchor (#South-Western Indian Ocean) has been
deleted by other users before.
[[Tropical cyclone scales#Comparisons_across_basins|scales]] The anchor (#Comparisons_across_basins) has been
deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
Since im a very annoying person i thought i would review this article for GA Status.
The 1995–96 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season was a moderately active season that included Cyclone Bonita, which was the first tropical cyclone to cross from the southern Indian Ocean into the southern Atlantic Ocean. - Surely this sentence should contain a phrase along the lines of known, on record etc, since im sure that there are other systems that have crossed into the Atlantic that "we dont know about."
The first storm, Intense Tropical Cyclone Agnielle, formed in the adjacent Australian basin on November 16 and later reached peak winds in the south-west Indian Ocean. - It would be better to see a link back to Tropical cyclone basins, and the Australian basin rephrased as the Australian region IMO.
That was the primary tool to estimate the intensity. I think it is worth noting, just like Atlantic seasons probably should emphasize that NHC uses recon. --♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
05:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC), which is a joint United States Navy – United States Air Force task force, also issued tropical cyclone warnings for the southwestern Indian Ocean.[3] - Might be worth specifying that they issued them on behalf of the US Government
In addition to the named storms, the MFR tracked 11 tropical depressions or disturbances that did not intensify into a tropical storm. The agency did not issue any bulletins on eight of them. - Read the ATCR carefully MFR did issue warnings on them.
Read carefully. The MFR issued 0 bulletins for eight of them. They issued some sort of warning for them, but I found it interesting that eight of them didn't receive bulletins. --♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
05:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Im not a fan off saying that the JTWC started to monitor Jenna based on a BT 6 hour position, when you say "In early May, a westerly wind burst associated with the Madden-Julian oscillation produced disturbances on both sides of the equator in the eastern Indian Ocean." based on JTWC.
Jason Rees (
talk)
01:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)reply
On May 3, the JTWC upgraded the system to tropical storm status, designating it Tropical Cyclone 28S, the last of the year. - The JTWC ATCR tells me that the JTWC initiated advisories early on May 2.
Jason Rees (
talk)
01:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Hang on the JTWC make a point of mentioning they initiated advisories in the report for the BoB twin, as a result that is what we have to go with off if we are saying when they initiated, regardless of when it achieved TS intensity in post analysis.
Jason Rees (
talk)
03:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Damn. So here's what happened. The report sometimes had different dates, I think due to irregularities with UTC, and I was reading it wrong. The BT has it crossing 90E on the 4th, which is what I'm going with. ♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
02:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC)reply