This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Oceania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceaniaWikipedia:WikiProject OceaniaTemplate:WikiProject OceaniaOceania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
oceans,
seas, and
bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
Aral Sea; check
La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
MS Estonia
At first, after adding it in, nothing showed up. Now, the bar graphs show up, but no words are. I've contacted the author of the 2007 Pacific typhoon season timeline to enlist some help.
Thegreatdr (
talk)
17:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Should 10-minute winds be included?
Obviously basing the article on JMA data doesn't work too well for pre-2000 seasons, but right here its values are taking precedence in the infoboxes. That's a flaw with the template, which I will have to look at when I am not so busy. Right now, is it too inconsistent to show 10-minute wind values along with 1-minute ones? Would the article be comprehensive enough without them?
Potapych (
talk)
13:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Greetings all reviewers. As far as I can tell, this is one of the first Pacific typhoon seasons to attempt GA. The big question is, does the lead have enough season information, or do we need to add an extremely long season summary?
Thegreatdr (
talk)
16:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The first thing is the "W suffix" that is attached to the end of the tropical depressions monitored by JTWC in 2008 however when i checked the 1982 JTWC Annual Tropical Cyclone Report i found that they didnt attach them so the sentance that says the W suffix is attached needs to be removed
Jason Rees (
talk) 23:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC) DoneThegreatdr (
talk)
04:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Whats a Tropical depression, Tropical Storm, Typhoon and Supper Typhoon? - Whilst i know what they are, someone new to this article might not have the technical knowledge to know what they are so i suggest adding in the JMA and the SSHS Scales. (I think i did a template for the JMA Scale when i did one for the Australian Regions scales and RSMC La Reunions)
Jason Rees (
talk)
00:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Im not going to hold the text of the timeline not showing up against you as i know theres a massive problem with it as a whole within WPTC
Jason Rees (
talk)
00:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
I am concerned that you have 25 References to the 1982 ATCR whilst this is acceptable i would like to see some references from some of the other warning centers - eg: The Hong Kong Observatory has a report on the 1982 season
here.
Jason Rees (
talk) 00:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC) DoneThegreatdr (
talk)
17:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The USD Damage needs to be reported in a common way as in Nancy's section you report that nancy caused "$46 million in damage (1982 USD)" Whilst in Mac's section you report that mac caused "US$1.5 million (1982 dollars)"
Jason Rees (
talk) 00:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC) DoneThegreatdr (
talk)
04:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
If we are going to link to the Eastern Pacific in the lead then we also need to link to south of the equator
Jason Rees (
talk) 00:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Done Dealt with this by removing link from lead.
Thegreatdr (
talk)
04:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
As for the lead it should be fine after those tweaks that i have suggested be made - Though i would add a new section called season summuary to the article
Jason Rees (
talk) 01:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC) DoneThegreatdr (
talk)
16:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Yep you have the only thing that needs doing is the Season Summuary needs Spliting off from the list of stroms but since thats only a minor thing ill pass the article - Well done
Jason Rees (
talk)
17:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
It is done. Thanks for the review. I left a comment on the
1939 Pacific typhoon season talk page (the other Pacific typhoon season GA) to add a seasonal summary. Before this review, I was uncertain whether or not we were using the same criteria for the Pacific typhoon season articles that we use in the Atlantic season articles.
Thegreatdr (
talk)
17:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
To be honest i prefer this format than the Atlantic one for the season articles allthough we need to have a look at the post 2000 PTS format as we have so many storms/depressions that the JMA do not upgrade
Jason Rees (
talk)
18:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
I have just modified 2 external links on
1982 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
1982 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.