This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles U.S. Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) events(s). United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numbers would be a lot more revealing than the graph. If someone comes to the site looking for numerical data (as is available in the US House election articles) counting the boxes can be a drag. -- Concerned User

I see now that if you read the article, you get the information, but if you want the info at a glance, the graph of boxes isn't of much value. -- Concerned User

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:United States Senate elections, 1914 and 1915 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 21:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC) reply

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:United States Senate elections, 1914 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 14:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Colorado should be marked as a Democratic hold, not a gain. It is treated as a hold by the race summary and the seat change. GigachadGigachad ( talk) 01:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC) reply