This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
project page to join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose – One source does not give any indication that this name is common nor widely accepted. The argument for consistency makes zero sense as these outbreaks aren't related but over 40 years apart.
United States Man (
talk)
21:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Neutral Hmm, an interesting case here. USM was the one who reverted it both times, so in theory, he should’ve been the one to open up the RM to move it back. He also is the one who is all about this “NWS is all that counts”, and an NWS site confirms it. Having said that, I couldn’t find any indication on this name from any other source.
72.80.246.5 (
talk)
15:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Oh wow, yet another Andrew5 IP. The WHOIS and edit habits couldn't make it any more obvious for both of these. The person is just routinely mad that myself and a couple others try to keep their ban-dodging in check.
United States Man (
talk)
19:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Leaning Oppose Its only referred as this by the NWS Birmingham. A mention of this can be put in, but I'm not totally sold on the name change here.
ChessEric00:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose for now – Grazulis is wrapping up publication of a new book that has "Super Outbreak" as a classification and that could justify a change. His scale ranks it with 182 points (120+ is Historic, but he has not stated how many points for Super Outbreak). Only one official source calling this a Super Outbreak isn't sufficient to be a common name for the time being. ~
Cyclonebiskit (
chat)
01:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.