A fact from 1930 Bago earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
earthquakes,
seismology,
plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
1930 Bago earthquake is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all
Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the
Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please
join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the
Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment: Hey Dora the Axe-plorer, I've seen you around Wikipedia quite a lot! Anyways, before I conduct my review I wish to disclaim that my knowledge on earthquakes is elementary; nevertheless, I hope that I can still give a good review and learn some things! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (
💬)
17:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Okay, these should be all my concerns. Fantastic article! If the review seems on the shorter side this is because most fixes were minor and I could do them myself. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns. I will put the article on hold for now but this should not take long. Also, no hard feelings if you wish to respectfully disagree with any of my points; we can probably work it out. Good luck, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (
💬)
18:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Fantastic work! I am now pleased to pass this article for good article status per the changes. Congratulations Dora the Axe-plorer, and I wish you luck on your other active earthquake GANs. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (
💬)
23:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)reply
File:Shwedagon Pagoda 1900.JPG: good, valid public domain rationale;
File:Yangon downtown at night.jpg: good, CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Prose
Per
WP:CITELEAD, the lead generally does not need citations unless content is controversial. Citations 2 and 3 are already cited later in the article; is it possible to use the first citation elsewhere in order to remove it from the lead?
Some localities mentioned in Earthquake should be wikilinked, e.g. Tongyi appears to have an article at
Tongyi, Mingin.
"Widespread ground deformation was reported. Surface ruptures, fault scarps and fissures appeared." – might be personal taste but I reckon the full stop could be replaced with a semi-colon.
"Several historically large and damaging earthquakes occurred on this fault." – does the source give any examples? If they have Wikipedia entries, this may be interesting to our readers.
"for centuries but there is limited academic research to understand their" – unlink "academic research"; it is currently a redirect to research, a primary topic that seems unnecessary to link as most readers known what research is.
"Shaking was violent enough to create large fissures, and thrusted alluvium was observed during surveys of the land." – wikilink alluvium.
"The earthquake left a significant part of Bago in ruins" – does this sentence mean that an important area of Bago was ruined, or that a large part of Bago was ruined? If the latter, rephrase to "The earthquake left a significant portion of Bago in ruins" to avoid confusion.
References
All citations are usable (reliable) and formatted correctly.
Spot check on refs 4, 8, 10, 20, 21 and 26 show no concerns—they all support the article's content.
See also
Good; portals relevant.
Other
Recommend adding
template:Use X English {{Use X English|date=January 2023}} (woah, '23!)
Infobox, short description, cats and navboxes all good; nice work!
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hi
Dora the Axe-plorer and
Onegreatjoke (
talk), review follows: article promoted to GA on 1 January; article is well written and cited inline throughout to what appear to be reliable sources; I don't have access to some of the sources but found no issue with overly close paraphrasing in a spotcheck; a QPQ has been carried out; hooks are both interesting enough for me; I added
moment magnitude to the first hook as magnitude by itself is ambiguous; AGF on source for the magnitude, other facts check out to the sources cited. Looks fine to me -
Dumelow (
talk)
11:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)reply