This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles
Moved this back because 'Ž' isn't in
ISO-8859-1.
Morwen 12:12, May 21, 2004 (UTC)
If the Slovenians call it Gorjanci more often than Žumberak, perhaps we should move it altogether? IIRC, a bit more of the mountain is in Slovenia than it is in Croatia. --
Joy [shallot] 20:39, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I went ahead and moved it to a compromise title, seeing how the names are really equivalent. I kept Žumberak in the first place primarily for backwards compatibility. --
Joy [shallot] 14:59, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
No problem. If I recall correctly, IIRC stay for If I recall correctly :)? --
andrejj 15:32, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Mild support - it's not really ideal, as the usage is not overwhelmingly one or the other - both seem to be common in English. However, the present article title does not meet naming conventions (just as we don't have an article called
Colour/Color, so we shouldn't have a slashed title here either). So we may as well go with the slightly more used name, but making sure all else is neutral - in Slovenian articles refer to it as Gorjanci, in Croatian as Žumberak and make sure both titles are mentioned in the lede. —
Amakuru (
talk)
12:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose. I just don't see a compelling argument. The cited guideline does not actually proscribe the current solution and I don't see anyone complaining about the ordering (asking to put Gorjanci first). A general Google search for English-only results for "Zumberak -Gorjanci" and then one for "Gorjanci -Zumberak" is inconclusive. A Google Books search - ditto. Just leave it be unless someone actually has a real argument against the current title form. --
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
12:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Support, per Alex. This sort of situation arises with many articles, and Wikipedia's solution is to pick just one of the names as the article title. I don't see any reason to do differently here.--
Kotniski (
talk)
14:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Support move to either
Žumberak or
Gorjanci. It's an unfortunate situation when we have to choose between two common variants of a name, but I don't think trying to use both names is a solution. As Amakuru said above, we should pick one form as the article title (ideally the one that's most common in English), make a redirect from the other name, and encourage editors to use the correct variant in different contexts.
Jafeluv (
talk)
17:42, 12 November 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 20 May 2015
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Žumberak Mountains. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.