Pimm has published more than 350 peer-reviewed scientific articles,[2][13] including several in the scientific journals Nature[3][4][5] and Science.[14][15][16] He has published several books including, A Scientist Audits the Earth[17] and he has published articles in popular science publications such as Scientific American.[18] Up until mid-2019, he was a regular contributor to the
National Geographic blog.[19]
Awards
He is an acknowledged authority in the field of conservation biology, recognized with several awards:
Pimm is a Master of Ecological Conservation with
The Beijing DeTao Masters Academy (DTMA), a high-level, multi-disciplined, application-oriented higher education institution in Shanghai, China.
New Mexico State University made him an alumnus of the year in 2005.[25]
A new wasp species from the cloud forests of
Colombia's tropical Andes has been named Dolichomitus pimmi in honor of Pimm and his conservation efforts in that region.[26]
SavingSpecies and Saving Nature
In 2010, Pimm founded a non-profit organization called SavingSpecies to preserve and restore natural habitats. In 2019, the organization was dissolved and Saving Nature was created to reflect a broader mission from the work that Saving Species has started.[27][28] Saving Nature partners with local nonprofit organizations to connect fragmented habitats into biocorridors for wildlife. It works in biodiversity hotspots, such as in Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador, India, Indonesia and Tanzania.[29]
Controversy
In 2014, Pimm was involved in a controversy related to allegedly sexist remarks he made in a
book review[30] published by the
Elsevier journal
Biological Conservation. Pimm's article "sparked debate on Twitter almost immediately."[31]
Despite pressure from activists (ibid.), the journal refused to retract Pimm's review, saying "The Book Review by Pimm is not being retracted. It just contains some offensive language. We want to emphasize to our readers that this type of offensive language does not reflect the policy or practice of our journal or Elsevier. We also have taken steps to ensure that this situation does not happen again."
However, the journal did issue a mea culpa, indicating an opinion of Pimm's article. "We would like to inform our readers that parts of the book review Keeping Wild: Against the Domestication of the Earth by Stuart Pimm, Volume 180, pages 151–152 are denigrating to women.".[32] Of Pimm's article, the journal admitted that "It just contains some offensive language." When challenged, Pimm responded that he did not think his "wording was sexist..." However, some disagreed. In a later letter to the editor,[33] Amanda Stanley, then Conservation Science Program Officer at the
Wilburforce Foundation, explained why Pimm's "...book review [was] so offensive."[34] An article in The New Yorker later that year explored the debate between conservationists that led to Pimm's controversial remark. The article asserted that, in his review, "Pimm’s emotions got the better of him." For his part, according to the article, Pimm was reported as being "totally unrepentant."[35]