Special:contributions Wixifixer

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

20:30 20:30, 30 March 2021 diff hist +701‎ Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) ‎No edit summary
20:19 20:19, 30 March 2021 diff hist +1,040‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎there are a few errors on the page, if someone would care to address them: new section

20:00 20:00, 8 March 2016 diff hist −50‎ m List of Skull and Bones members ‎ consistent with descriptions of others.

11:18 11:18, 30 October 2015 diff hist −28‎ Robert Kagan ‎ Can someone in a position of authority please explain to me why only people of the Jewish faith are identified as such in Wikipedia? I never see anyone identified as Protestant or Catholic. Is Wikipedia in charge of keeping track of the Jews in America?

21:58 21:58, 22 January 2015 diff hist −51‎ Robert Kagan ‎ simply not true, Owen. just looked up three other foreign policy writers: Walter Russell Mead, John Mearsheimer, and Joseph Nye. none of them have ethnicity listed.

16:17 16:17, 20 January 2015 diff hist −51‎ Robert Kagan ‎ pls explain relevance.

21:16 21:16, 17 January 2015 diff hist −51‎ Robert Kagan ‎ not relevant, unless it is Wikipedia's policy to make sure everyone knows who the jews are.

15:08 15:08, 30 December 2014 diff hist −27‎ Robert Kagan ‎ see comments above
15:00 15:00, 30 December 2014 diff hist −98‎ Robert Kagan ‎ What is the relevance of the religious affiliation here? Unless Wikipedia wishes its readers to know who is a jew and who is not. are other scholars identified by their religion?
14:58 14:58, 30 December 2014 diff hist −5‎ Robert Kagan ‎ Is Wikipedia attempting to make sure that it's readers know who is a jew and who is not? I don't notice other scholars identified by their religion. Donald Kagan is a historian of ancient Greece. Of what relevance is it that he is of Jewish descent.

16:21 16:21, 20 March 2012 diff hist +35‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
16:20 16:20, 20 March 2012 diff hist +70‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism

22:34 22:34, 18 March 2012 diff hist +142‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
21:08 21:08, 18 March 2012 diff hist +522‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
21:01 21:01, 18 March 2012 diff hist +19‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
20:57 20:57, 18 March 2012 diff hist +135‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
20:40 20:40, 18 March 2012 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
20:39 20:39, 18 March 2012 diff hist +809‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
20:13 20:13, 18 March 2012 diff hist +331‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
19:53 19:53, 18 March 2012 diff hist +67‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
19:43 19:43, 18 March 2012 diff hist +7‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
19:42 19:42, 18 March 2012 diff hist +1,018‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism

17:42 17:42, 16 March 2012 diff hist +191‎ User talk:Wixifixer ‎ →‎Robert Kagan as neoconservative
17:39 17:39, 16 March 2012 diff hist +21‎ User talk:Wixifixer ‎ →‎Robert Kagan as neoconservative
17:37 17:37, 16 March 2012 diff hist +311‎ User talk:Wixifixer ‎ →‎Robert Kagan as neoconservative
17:22 17:22, 16 March 2012 diff hist +289‎ User talk:Wixifixer ‎ →‎Robert Kagan as neoconservative
17:14 17:14, 16 March 2012 diff hist +34‎ User talk:Wixifixer ‎No edit summary
17:08 17:08, 16 March 2012 diff hist +192‎ User talk:Wixifixer ‎ →‎Robert Kagan as neoconservative
17:01 17:01, 16 March 2012 diff hist +157‎ User talk:Wixifixer ‎No edit summary
16:57 16:57, 16 March 2012 diff hist −982‎ Robert Kagan ‎ see my entry on talk page.
16:55 16:55, 16 March 2012 diff hist +810‎ Talk:Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Neoconservatism
16:48 16:48, 16 March 2012 diff hist −983‎ Robert Kagan ‎ PNAC mentioned below. on the other point, you are imposing personal opinion on this entry.
16:16 16:16, 16 March 2012 diff hist −29‎ Robert Kagan ‎ →‎External links
16:11 16:11, 16 March 2012 diff hist −982‎ Robert Kagan ‎ you are adding your PERSONAL editorial judgment as to what is appropriate and what is not. If we let that happen for every Wikipedia entry, then every person listed could be characterized by their political opponents as they saw fit.
11:43 11:43, 16 March 2012 diff hist −29‎ Robert Kagan ‎ →‎External links
11:41 11:41, 16 March 2012 diff hist +31‎ Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Career
11:40 11:40, 16 March 2012 diff hist −49‎ Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Career: no longer
11:38 11:38, 16 March 2012 diff hist −983‎ Robert Kagan ‎ The term is a subjective label and inappropriate. the reference to the organization that has been defunct for years belongs properly in the bio section.

17:10 17:10, 3 March 2012 diff hist −14‎ Kagan ‎ "neoconservative" is subjective, not factual
17:08 17:08, 3 March 2012 diff hist −364‎ Robert Kagan ‎ I have never seen an entry like that elsewhere in Wikipedia. Will others' entries classify them as "liberal" or "left-liberal" ? I can find articles that cite everyone is some fashion. This is political prejudice. please stop.
17:03 17:03, 3 March 2012 diff hist −305‎ Victoria Nuland ‎ →‎Personal life: In-laws are not relevant to Ms. Nuland's career. I have not seen in-laws listed in other Wikpedia biographies.
17:02 17:02, 3 March 2012 diff hist −10‎ Victoria Nuland ‎ →‎Personal life: see Wikipedia entry for Robert Kagan
17:01 17:01, 3 March 2012 diff hist −30‎ Victoria Nuland ‎ →‎Personal life: not relevant to her job.

22:06 22:06, 23 February 2012 diff hist +4‎ Robert Kagan ‎ →‎Career

31 March 2021

30 March 2021

8 March 2016

30 October 2015

22 January 2015

20 January 2015

17 January 2015

30 December 2014

23 March 2012

20 March 2012

18 March 2012

16 March 2012

3 March 2012

23 February 2012