12:1712:17, 1 July 2017diffhist−539
Lund
→History: This has nothing to do with the city. And it was not a particularly "Scanian uprising", but a social one.
22:1722:17, 20 September 2015diffhist−24
Landskrona
The town is not bilingual. The older spelling is not an actual "Danish name". This form is also mentioned under "History" and that is OK.
21:3421:34, 1 September 2015diffhist−112
Scanian dialect
The original source for the "80,000" is wild guess from a layman, who admits that "noone has couted them". Ethnologe rejected it already in the next edition
21:3421:34, 31 August 2015diffhist−112
Scanian dialect
If someone wants to put those 80,000 in the article there must be a more RELIABLE source than ONE edistion of Ethnologue (witout a proper soure of itself
08:5308:53, 15 August 2015diffhist−40
Scanian dialect
More than one million persons speak this dialect/accent. 80 000 was only in one edition of Ethnologue. They admitted it was a mistake. Which is the "original" source for this absurd number?
11 August 2015
11:3311:33, 11 August 2015diffhist−96
Scanian dialect
Even Ethnologue has removed this utterly absurd number of speakers (80 000). No reliable source for this. And a dialect can not be a dialect of another one