15:1315:13, 7 January 2021diffhist+333
United States
adding a sentence about human rights accusations against US. If the introduction to the China article has something like this, then so should the US.Tag: Reverted
02:1402:14, 13 December 2018diffhist+327
China
change last sentence in lede to keep up with reality: china is obviously the world's other superpower now (with three new citations in support)
09:2709:27, 24 October 2018diffhist+19
Epicurus
fine i agree to leave out a whole new sentence about it, but i do think it's important to have something in first paragaph about it, so adding "highly influential"
22:0522:05, 23 October 2018diffhist+347
Epicurus
add reference to IEP calling him one of the major philosophers of hellenistic period; i think it's important to have something in the lead that speaks to his signifiance in the greek philosophical tradition
10:4410:44, 1 May 2018diffhist−133
China
better to cite the imf data mapper (different version of same source) because it gives you the data in any year you choose rather than mixing from multiple years; also visually very nice to look at
10:2810:28, 1 May 2018diffhist−539
China
zanhe makes fair point; let's keep only the 2018 numbers from imf source, getting rid of the other source under nominal GDPTag: Undo
10:3310:33, 30 April 2018diffhist−486
China
Undid revision 838607955 by
Zanhe (
talk) See talk page; it's better if this article uses 2018 figures, which better reflect current standard of living in ChinaTag: Undo
10:5010:50, 25 April 2018diffhist+1
China
Put in 2018 GDP data; projections are still acceptable, especially when they're this short-term and come from a reliable source. I suggest Zanhe chill out a little bit.