05:1905:19, 31 October 2008diffhist+725
Aspartame controversy
Restore section. Specific Editor request was made on 10/22/08 to discuss before mass removal of text from this section that eliminates one side of the argument.
19:3719:37, 22 October 2008diffhist+4,183
Aspartame controversy
Requested talk first before removing huge sections of articles, especially when removing primarily one side of the article. Please see discuss and let's come to consensus on each issue. Thank you.
03:4603:46, 5 October 2008diffhist+301
Aspartame controversy
References changed to remove "Bressler Report" and use references per discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Aspartame_controversy#Removal_of_links_and_references
03:3603:36, 5 October 2008diffhist−73
Aspartame
While the consensus was a prominent link to aspartame controversy page so as not to hide it, I think this was the suggestion (although it was not specified). Now the same as other pages.
03:0603:06, 5 October 2008diffhist+129
Aspartame
Self-References are references to a section/sentence itself, this is a reference to another article. Ironically, the self-reference Wiki page also points to another web page using "see ..."
02:1802:18, 30 September 2008diffhist+129
Aspartame
Part of consensus for spliting article -- in order not to hide what is of interest to most readers. I would be amenable to using {{Seealso}} if it was at the extreme top of the article. Please discuss