20:0720:07, 31 May 2021diffhist−422
Rose water
→Images: There is no encyclopaedic value in this collection of images. Wikimedia Commons exists for general collections of imagesTag: Reverted
20:0520:05, 31 May 2021diffhist+37
Rose water
→Edible: made less fragmented and less repetitiveTag: Reverted
20:0020:00, 31 May 2021diffhist−198
Rose water
Undid revision 1026167311 by
Wikaviani (
talk) non-neutral is non-neutral, and size of article is no justification for violating guidelines.Tags: UndoReverted
12:5312:53, 31 May 2021diffhist−24
Yaphet Kotto
even if
WP:SLASH was not common sense, putting a space after two of the misused slashes would be a woeful failure to meet basic standards
11:4011:40, 31 May 2021diffhist−21
Rose water
removed non-neutral claims, made sure that things mentioned in the lead are mentioned in the articleTag: Reverted
11:3611:36, 31 May 2021diffhist−177
Rose water
not mentioned in articleTag: Reverted
11:1811:18, 31 May 2021diffhist−756
Darian King
This article was absurdly bad. Six sentences split over four paragraphs, two of the sentences were nonsensical and non-neutral, errors of capitalisation, punctuation, tense, repetitions... Wikipedia is not designed to produce a quality encyclopaedia, that is for sure.
09:0309:03, 31 May 2021diffhist−13
Singular they
Separating this into a list with a single item does not look good. A paragraph with the example in the text looks better.