22:4922:49, 31 May 2017diffhist−1,921
Greg Gianforte
this needs to be taken out until it can be sourced properly. all 4 sources use either huffingtonpost, the week, etc. wikipedia standards include reliable, verifiable sources. an off hand comment to his church is not an "official position" or reliableTag: Visual edit: Switched
19:4219:42, 14 January 2014diffhist−504
Ann Coulter
Reference page no longer exists and I have no clue how you can donate "about" $250. For accuracy please use exact amounts.
04:4004:40, 14 January 2013diffhist−287
2011 Norway attacks
usage of "right wing" too broad here. source is one paragraph and anonymous. tv channel saying "right wing" with anonymous source shouldn't be definitive. even wiki page for right wing doesn't fit Ander's ideology. more specific information available
10:2510:25, 3 October 2012diffhist−326
Denny Rehberg
→Boating accident: removed extraneous details about Barkus sentencing. Barkus previous convictions, other possible outcomes of sentencing really unnecessary on Rehberg's page. fails objectivity to have every detail of Barkus' crime on Rehberg's page
01:0801:08, 1 October 2012diffhist−683
Denny Rehberg
→Tenure: Pell Grants include no specifics, half the entry is about school lunches, language of "ripping off" is subjective, not up to Wikipedia standards of objectivity. Shouldn't be included if can't be done objectively and on topic.
01:0701:07, 1 October 2012diffhist−943
Denny Rehberg
→Tenure: If this is to be included it should be in context of the Larry Craig incident and not as some official position, as is the standard for issue blurbs. Out of context joke not specific to gays are not policy issues or positions
01:0401:04, 1 October 2012diffhist−453
Denny Rehberg
→Tenure: This source when pulled up contains absolutely no references to Rehberg or the above quote, should be pulled until verifiable source is obtained.