14:4514:45, 17 May 2022diffhist−375
Cold fusion
Undid revision 1087852437 by
Brian Josephson (
talk) seems insufficiently relevant for the lede section (could go in the "conferences" section). It was just an exploratory workshop, it reached no conclusions, and it seems nothing came of it. Whereas the other things in that paragraph are panel reports reaching conclusions about LENR.Tags: UndoReverted
02:0602:06, 14 July 2021diffhist+3
AI alignment
Undid revision 1032710503 by
Junya 77 (
talk) "utility" may confuse people into thinking that this is related to utility functions. "Usefulness" doesn't have that problem, and is understandable and accurate.Tag: Undo
15:5415:54, 1 April 2021diffhist−10
Cold fusion
I don't see support for the claim that there is a "revival" of interest (in the sense that, say, world investment in CF is higher right now than 5 or 10 years ago). Some new projects have started, some old projects have stopped, how do we know the total went up? Also, the Nature citation clearly states that it was a failed replication, and this is stated elsewhere in this article.