05:4605:46, 14 September 2012diffhist−1,067
Paul Ryan
Removed refs of insignificant praise, insincerely added to deceitfully make this sentence seem innocent and neutral.
01:3101:31, 8 September 2012diffhist−2,035
Paul Ryan
It is you (
talk) who is edit-warring. Do not include a controvertial allegation until consensus. Presumption of Innocence, heard about it, you pest?!
00:2100:21, 8 September 2012diffhist−2,035
Paul Ryan
It is in a middle of dispute so do not add sentence until sufficient consensus - which currently does not exist - is there.
06:2006:20, 7 September 2012diffhist−1,523
Paul Ryan
There is NO consensus to criticizing this speech as dishonest. Talk page is very clear about that. Cease and desist. Anyone re-adding this claim should be banned from editing from WP as they are deliberately ignoring a discussion on the Talk page.
01:5501:55, 5 September 2012diffhist−1,349
Paul Ryan
Beware of engaging in an Edit War! Play Nice! Go back to the Talk page. Currently there is NO consensus as to including the word "lies" which you seem so desperately keen to add. Discuss in the Talk page before adding.
01:2501:25, 5 September 2012diffhist−1,350
Paul Ryan
A controvertial sentence which doesn't say much more than: "his political supporters liked his speech and his political opponents didn't". Duh! Please discuss in the Talk page before returning this sentence. There is a section for it.
06:4006:40, 4 September 2012diffhist−49
Paul Ryan
Puh-lease do NOT cite a "Guardian" opinion piece as anything more than just that - namely: opinion. Otherwise, anyone to the right of Joseph Stalin would be a Fascist Liar. Puh-lease.