10:5910:59, 12 April 2008diffhist−6
David Tennant
Removed highly unflattering photo of person added recently; replaced with photo already in use in body of article.
11:4511:45, 27 October 2007diffhist+34
Macintosh 128K
"128K was comparable to the IBM PC" is completely untrue. I was there, working in the computer biz in '84. Trust me in this!
24 October 2007
05:0605:06, 24 October 2007diffhist+32
Macintosh 128K
Undo of latest edit. "Contemporary" means of same time, not same cost. In any case, IBM PCs with more RAM did not cost anywhere near "same as minis".
08:2408:24, 15 October 2007diffhist+1
m
Macintosh 128K
Added note that memory was much less than the IBM PC, also that memory could not be upgraded without motherboards replacement.