3 August 2016

• 04:07 04:07, 3 August 2016 diff hist −386‎ m DePaul University ‎ Undid revision 732722832 by Plokmijnuhbygvtfcdxeszwaq Consensus on the Milo entry was found back in May. Please don't add an entry that is inaccurate and has no consensus.

15 July 2016

• 12:26 12:26, 15 July 2016 diff hist −386‎ m DePaul University ‎ Consensus on the phrasing of the entry was already found in May. No developments have happened regarding the incident, which means any additional entry needs to find consensus. Please stop the disruptive editing.

13 July 2016

• 17:53 17:53, 13 July 2016 diff hist −386‎ m DePaul University ‎ Undid revision 729618482 by 129.12.123.19 ( talk) We had a lengthy discussion on this back in May, and have decided to include a brief 1-2 sentences with that specific phrasing.

9 July 2016

• 08:56 08:56, 9 July 2016 diff hist +18‎ m Battlefield 1 ‎ The teamwork emphasis of the game should be clear in the entry
• 04:19 04:19, 9 July 2016 diff hist −207‎ m DePaul University ‎ Undid revision 728967992 by 71.196.200.193 ( talk) Consensus already found in May to include a brief 1-2 sentences entry on the incident

29 June 2016

• 18:11 18:11, 29 June 2016 diff hist +29‎ Talk:Battlefield 1 ‎ →‎Multiplayer Classes
• 18:10 18:10, 29 June 2016 diff hist +118‎ m Talk:Battlefield 1 ‎No edit summary
• 18:08 18:08, 29 June 2016 diff hist +1,140‎ m Battlefield 1 ‎ Added BF1's multiplayer classes
• 17:36 17:36, 29 June 2016 diff hist +94‎ m Battlefield 1 ‎No edit summary
• 17:27 17:27, 29 June 2016 diff hist +11‎ m Battlefield 1 ‎ The Battlefield series is known to have an emphasis on teamwork. Thought this should be added in the initial portion of the entry.

16 June 2016

• 13:38 13:38, 16 June 2016 diff hist +537‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Logged in

12 June 2016

• 14:47 14:47, 12 June 2016 diff hist −226‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Signature
• 14:46 14:46, 12 June 2016 diff hist +3‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Typo
• 14:43 14:43, 12 June 2016 diff hist +656‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Do controversies really belong in a university's Wiki page?
• 14:36 14:36, 12 June 2016 diff hist +234‎ m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:TJD2 Reported by :User:Khalidmilan result:( )
• 02:31 02:31, 12 June 2016 diff hist +497‎ m User talk:TJD2 ‎No edit summary
• 02:29 02:29, 12 June 2016 diff hist −908‎ DePaul University ‎ I have lodged an official complaint and reported you. As Elkevbo mentioned, there is no consensus whatsoever. You took my suggestion on Talk:DePaul, twisted it on its head, then untruthfully claimed consensus for your own biased agenda.
• 02:24 02:24, 12 June 2016 diff hist +944‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Do controversies really belong in a university's Wiki page?
• 02:14 02:14, 12 June 2016 diff hist +1‎ m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ Typo
• 02:13 02:13, 12 June 2016 diff hist +79‎ m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ Signature
• 02:13 02:13, 12 June 2016 diff hist +1,910‎ m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ Edit War User : TJD2

11 June 2016

• 22:26 22:26, 11 June 2016 diff hist −908‎ DePaul University ‎ Undid revision 724815015 by TJD2 ( talk). This was discussed on the talk page and there are no objections. Furthermore, there was no consensus to you making the controversy subsection into a whole section.
• 22:23 22:23, 11 June 2016 diff hist +597‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Do controversies really belong in a university's Wiki page?
• 10:23 10:23, 11 June 2016 diff hist +372‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Do controversies really belong in a university's Wiki page?
• 10:21 10:21, 11 June 2016 diff hist −61‎ DePaul University ‎ Per Talk:DePaul, I have merged and integrated the controversy section into the history section. I have also tweaked the section for more accurate chronological order and better reading flow.
• 09:37 09:37, 11 June 2016 diff hist +84‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Do controversies really belong in a university's Wiki page?
• 09:33 09:33, 11 June 2016 diff hist +528‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Do controversies really belong in a university's Wiki page?
• 09:20 09:20, 11 June 2016 diff hist +505‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Controversy Section requires Black Lives Matter incident
• 09:15 09:15, 11 June 2016 diff hist −847‎ m DePaul University ‎ As mentioned by Elkevbo in Talk:DePaul, the refrences you are providing are 1- not relevant to the entry 2- are op-eds and considered unreliable. We have a perfectly reliable and relevant neutral source. No need to add op-eds.

10 June 2016

• 06:43 06:43, 10 June 2016 diff hist −918‎ m DePaul University ‎ Hello, consensus was to add a brief single sentence regarding the event. You can suggest adding more by visiting DePaul's talk.I have also removed op-ed references regarding the event, as they are not consider reliable sources.
• 06:33 06:33, 10 June 2016 diff hist +8‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Typo
• 06:32 06:32, 10 June 2016 diff hist 0‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Inserted links to the mentioned universities
• 06:31 06:31, 10 June 2016 diff hist +12‎ Talk:DePaul University ‎ Inserted links to the names universities
• 06:30 06:30, 10 June 2016 diff hist +962‎ Talk:DePaul University ‎ Suggestion to the controversy subsection

6 June 2016

• 07:06 07:06, 6 June 2016 diff hist +391‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Controversy Section requires Black Lives Matter incident
• 07:03 07:03, 6 June 2016 diff hist −2,304‎ m DePaul University ‎ Full paragraph on Milo event is unwarranted, no consensus on it. Seeing that many users suggested adding a sentence on the event, I have added a brief description. Also merged it with above paragraph for better reading flow
• 00:52 00:52, 6 June 2016 diff hist +117‎ DePaul University ‎ Per discussion on talk:DePaul, I added sub-categories to DePaul's History

3 June 2016

• 07:09 07:09, 3 June 2016 diff hist +422‎ m User talk:TJD2 ‎ →‎Milo at DePaul
• 06:51 06:51, 3 June 2016 diff hist +480‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Controversy Section requires Black Lives Matter incident: New comment
• 05:52 05:52, 3 June 2016 diff hist +400‎ m User talk:TJD2 ‎ →‎Milo at DePaul
• 05:50 05:50, 3 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Forgot to sign my post
• 05:49 05:49, 3 June 2016 diff hist +326‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Controversy Section requires Black Lives Matter incident
• 05:45 05:45, 3 June 2016 diff hist −1,020‎ m DePaul University ‎ As others have said, no consensus. I will report you for disruptive editing if you do not stop
• 04:27 04:27, 3 June 2016 diff hist +118‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ →‎Breaking DePaul's History Section into Subsections
• 04:26 04:26, 3 June 2016 diff hist +32‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Comment edit.
• 04:23 04:23, 3 June 2016 diff hist +537‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ My personal take on the matter

2 June 2016

• 22:52 22:52, 2 June 2016 diff hist +6‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Edited a typo
• 22:46 22:46, 2 June 2016 diff hist +517‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Proposal :subsections in DePaul's history section
• 21:48 21:48, 2 June 2016 diff hist −1,429‎ m User talk:Khalidmilan ‎ Moved discussion to talk: DePaul
• 19:51 19:51, 2 June 2016 diff hist +425‎ m Talk:DePaul University ‎ Opinion