23:0823:08, 1 June 2020diffhist+73
Jo-Ann Stores
→Controversy: Corrected misleading statement about fabric sector business practices cited to misleading news article (which should be retained as it accurately portrays the controversy despite the fallacy central to the controversy (that remnants are "just scraps")).Tag: Visual edit
12 May 2020
19:5919:59, 12 May 2020diffhist+776
Ethnic conflict
→Examples of ethnic conflicts: Reordered list of examples to demote USA bias as well as adding critical cross-links to contextualize the use of the term "race war" in the United States as a rhetorical tactic rather than empirical reality. More work is needed beyond my expertise, as detailed in an invisible note.Tag: Visual edit
02:3502:35, 25 March 2020diffhist+474
Deep state
Reworded lede to more accurately represent neutral encyclopedic tone as well as reflect the greatly expanded new sections dealing with scholarly understanding of "the state" and the "deep state" which are now explained in new sections added below.Tag: Visual edit
02:3202:32, 25 March 2020diffhist+5,995
Deep state
Reworked "Overview" section in two three substantive sections to both increase quality of the page as well as remove "overview' which is considered poor Wikipedia style.Tag: Visual edit
20:5520:55, 11 February 2020diffhist+5
m
Political science
I have changed all references to Behaviouralism/behaviour (British English) to Behavioralism/behavior (American English) as that is how this American-led movement in the 1930's onward spelled it. I absolutely understand that spelling policing is very often bad wiki practice, but in this case the American spelling is important in order to match the article(s) which are linked to (Behavioralism & Human behavior). Inconsistency in spelling is very often irrelevant but here it is not.Tag: Visual edit
16:4516:45, 11 February 2020diffhist+836
User:Icy13/Deep state
Moved a blurb about scholarly understanding from the "overview" section to the intro to the "scholarly understanding" section and added additional discussion of normativism vs. positivism (a critical distinction when dealing with controversial political concepts such as this article)Tag: Visual edit