Special:contributions Hangsun.577

This account is currently blocked. ( Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

18:26, 22 February 2021 EvergreenFir talk contribs blocked Hangsun.577 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Making legal threats https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Fences_and_windows&diff=prev&oldid=1007748899) Tag: Twinkle

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

19:06 19:06, 19 February 2021 diff hist +335‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ Adding verified sources to this conversation, made public by Logan. Fences and Windows is a left-wing biased political player. Tag: Reverted
18:59 18:59, 19 February 2021 diff hist +81‎ m User talk:Hangsun.577 ‎ →‎Lisa D. Cook
18:48 18:48, 19 February 2021 diff hist −621‎ m Ron Johnson ‎ Removed left-wing bias. Tag: Reverted

07:06 07:06, 13 February 2021 diff hist +332‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ →‎Career: Someone keeps purging my edit. Stop with the bias. You don't get too decide what credible edits someone can make. Tag: Reverted

06:52 06:52, 12 February 2021 diff hist 0‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ →‎Career: Fixed typo. Tag: Reverted
06:51 06:51, 12 February 2021 diff hist −3‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ →‎Career: Minor edit to last edit. Tag: Reverted
06:51 06:51, 12 February 2021 diff hist +334‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ →‎Career: My edit was removed without cause. Stop removing it. Tag: Reverted

03:31 03:31, 11 February 2021 diff hist −15‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ Authority is loosely used. Writing on Russian economy doesn't make you an "authority on international economics." It makes you an authority on the Russian economy. Tag: Reverted
03:05 03:05, 11 February 2021 diff hist 0‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ →‎Career Tag: Reverted
03:05 03:05, 11 February 2021 diff hist 0‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ →‎Career Tag: Reverted
03:04 03:04, 11 February 2021 diff hist +350‎ m Lisa D. Cook ‎ →‎Career: Statements about the Tea-Party movement. Tag: Reverted

03:33 03:33, 18 January 2021 diff hist +40‎ m Frank Leon Roberts ‎ Added additional fellowship.
03:32 03:32, 18 January 2021 diff hist −36‎ m Frank Leon Roberts ‎ →‎Controversies
02:55 02:55, 18 January 2021 diff hist −1‎ m Frank Leon Roberts ‎No edit summary
02:55 02:55, 18 January 2021 diff hist +1,141‎ m Frank Leon Roberts ‎ Added controversies about public statements.
02:43 02:43, 18 January 2021 diff hist −1,702‎ m Martha MacCallum ‎ Once again, the "controversy" cited here is meant to target Martha as a result of political bias. I have contacted Martha and her attorneys will be looking at Wikipedia's politically-motivated bias for only targeting conservatives. Stop changing my edits!!!! Tag: Reverted

09:03 09:03, 16 January 2021 diff hist −37‎ Alvaro Huerta ‎ →‎Career
09:02 09:02, 16 January 2021 diff hist +39‎ Alvaro Huerta ‎ →‎Career
09:01 09:01, 16 January 2021 diff hist +1‎ Alvaro Huerta ‎ →‎Career
09:00 09:00, 16 January 2021 diff hist +1‎ Alvaro Huerta ‎ →‎Career
08:59 08:59, 16 January 2021 diff hist +6‎ m Alvaro Huerta ‎ →‎Career
08:58 08:58, 16 January 2021 diff hist +336‎ m Alvaro Huerta ‎ →‎Career: Updated to account for political positions
08:53 08:53, 16 January 2021 diff hist +41‎ m Alvaro Huerta ‎ Added additional field of research.
08:51 08:51, 16 January 2021 diff hist −619‎ m Martha MacCallum ‎ →‎Awards and criticism: Once again, I am removing this because this is politically motivated. Wikipedia editors are notorious for marking as many "controversies" for conservatives but purging them for liberals. If this is added once again, I will disclose screenshots of the entire process I have been documenting here and make it public. Tag: Manual revert

09:55 09:55, 13 January 2021 diff hist −619‎ m Martha MacCallum ‎ →‎Awards and criticism: I removed unnecessary mentions of "criticisms" that are motivated by political bias. I have added similar sourced "criticisms" to liberal-leaning news personalities, only to have them removed. If wikipedia is to be objective, they should apply same standards to BOTH right and left-leaning personalities. If this is added again, then it shows the strong bias of Wikipedia editors. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
09:49 09:49, 13 January 2021 diff hist −462‎ m Martha MacCallum ‎ →‎Awards and criticism Tag: Reverted
09:48 09:48, 13 January 2021 diff hist −619‎ m Martha MacCallum ‎ →‎Awards and criticism Tag: Reverted