20:0920:09, 14 January 2021diffhist−108
Chris Jacobs (politician)
→U.S. House of Representatives: Removed the Synthesis information again. You did comment on the talk page but you just made a claim again, without providing evidenc. You did not provide a reliable source to support your addition. The Verge's headline is only thing close that is just one source and it is not a reliable source. The NY Times articles does not say it and the WIVB article does not say it. You have not provided a reliable source to support your claim. See:
Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS.
18:4118:41, 14 January 2021diffhist−616
Chris Jacobs (politician)
Undid revision 1000319376 by
Praxidicae (
talk) Jacobs vote did not happen until after the attack on the capitol. This is synthesis. The article you cite does not support the comment you are putting in the article. You need to go to talk page and discuss it. Your good faith edit has been reverted and now you need to get consensus to re-insert it.Tags: UndoReverted
16:4316:43, 14 January 2021diffhist+3,047
Aaron Coleman
reverted good faith edits of redlink editor. many reliable sources were removed. Valid, important information was deleted from article. Editor needs to discuss these changes on article's talk page.Tag: Manual revert
22:4522:45, 13 January 2021diffhist−449
Lauren Boebert
→Tenure: Unbelievable. Are we going to post every single, little thing that happens to this woman? Her Twitter account status, her bag check, Democrats wanting her to resign. What in that list is really encyclopedic. It is just normal every day things that do not get posted to other people's accounts. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. See:
Wikipedia:NOTNEWS.Tags: Manual revertReverted
22:3322:33, 13 January 2021diffhist−642
Jody Hice
Undid revision 1000165425 by
Paintspot (
talk) both of the those facts belong in the body of the article, but not in the lead.removed sentence from the lead. The sentence is a classic example of
Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. There is no connection between Stefanik's vote and the storming of the capitol and the Reliable Sources do not support that POV editTag: Undo
16:3816:38, 13 January 2021diffhist−45
Lauren Boebert
→Tenure: removed the second reference to the metal detectors being new. We get it, they were new. It already said that. removed redundancy. The article is about metal detectors or those particular metal detectors.
16:2416:24, 13 January 2021diffhist−1,284
Elise Stefanik
removed sentence from the lead. The sentence is a classic example of
Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. There is no connection between Stefanik's vote and the storming of the capitol and the Reliable Sources do not support that POV edit.
15:4015:40, 13 January 2021diffhist−108
Chris Jacobs (politician)
Undid revision 1000097426 by
Rider1819 (
talk) The discussion on the Ted Cruz talk page does not lend support to this edit here. They have nothing to do with each other. There is no connection between Jacobs vote and the storming of the capitol and the Reliable Sources do not support that.
Wikipedia:SYNTHESISTag: Undo
22:1422:14, 12 January 2021diffhist−20
Lauren Boebert
→Tenure: the article supporting this info does not say she was tweeting to QAnon supporters. That is false info. removed.
22:1222:12, 12 January 2021diffhist+257
Lauren Boebert
→Tenure: corrected information. The politicians were Democrats. And the articles called the protestors "Pueblo residents" not Colorado citizens.
13:5813:58, 11 January 2021diffhist+766
Lauren Boebert
Undid revision 999633317 by
Drmies (
talk) Reverted removal of opposition to socialism. It has been in article for a long time and there has not been a convincing argument to remove it and the one given here isn't either.Tags: UndoReverted
03:5803:58, 11 January 2021diffhist−1,508
Lee Zeldin
The election objection info doesn't belong in the opening section and I removed info that is not about Zeldin. The article is about Zeldin.